🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.A32.3.93.970103...@srv1.freenet.calgary.ab.ca>,
"S.C. Riesen" <scpa...@freenet.calgary.ab.ca> wrote:

> Dear Anonymous,
> 
  [a lot snipped]

S.C. Riesen, it's interesting that your choice of quotation
below is NOT a quoting of the original posting.  You quoted
the bastardized/impostor version, but due to the ambiguity
inherent when an impostor uses a duplicate I.D., you may
have really intended your letter to him, did you?

 
> On Thu, 2 Jan 1997, Anonymous wrote:
> 
> > In article <5ah77o$i...@sue.cc.uregina.ca>,
> > ba...@borealis.cs.uregina.ca (John  Bayko) wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > > Are you implying that sexual harassment should be encouraged
> > > instead?
> > 
> > 
> > I don't even know how you could have come up with such an
> > intimation - derived, no less, from taking my quote out of
> > context. Sophistry!
> > 
> > Anyway, perhaps a clarification is in order.
> > 
> > The passage of equality laws for women have worked to incite
> > men to harass women in the workplace more, because there are
> > more women in the workplace.  There was far less resentment
> > and harassment when there were fewer laws, because then women
> > could only be harassed at home, where they belong.  That's
> > just the way it is.  And no one need attempt to convince me
> > otherwise - I already anticipate the kind of responses to
> > this.  I am all-knowing.
> > 
> > If women would just stay at home and satisfy their men the
> > way God intended, we wouldn't have any harassment in the
> > workplace.

Not mine!!  Nor are several other USENET impostor postings.
Isn't this a lovely reflection upon the mentality of the
liberal establishment?