🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 30 Dec 1996 18:07:33 -0500, nob...@notknown.org (Anonymous)
wrote:

>Anonymous responds:
>
>It does not matter how capable or talented females are as workers.
>The big problem is with females as managers.  They will not
>tolerate capable male subordinates for very long.  Oh yes, they
>will utilize top male talent when they are desperate for help,
>but as soon as the desperation passes, out goes the top-notch
>male.

If you replace every occurence of 'male' by 'female' and the converse,
it would be much nearer the truth. There are many men who are almost
dysfunctional when working for a female boss.

  This is why females are IN THE BIGGER PICTURE destroying
>American competitiveness.  For further evidence, pay attention
>to females.  They are big on "cooperation," and they denigrate
>"competitiveness."  Yet, in reality, females are savagely
>competitive with males, but not in a constructive way.  They 
>are competitive in a destructive way.
>
This is a personal opinion, not a general characteristic, and is
totally unfounded in fact.

>Platypus, you seem to be living proof that females prefer inferior
>subordinates!

This is just abuse. One might as well say that ytour are unable to
admit that a femle could ever be superior to you, either in position
or ability.