Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621419Re: Old word processors
From: Peter Flass
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:42
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:42
74 lines
5137 bytes
5137 bytes
<hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote: > On Saturday, March 24, 2018 at 1:51:12 AM UTC-4, Charles Richmond wrote: > >>> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 1:43:54 AM UTC-4, Gene Wirchenko wrote: >>> >>>>> Also the "personal computer" boom started in the 80s. >>>> >>>> Mid '70s. >>>> >>>> IBM joined in after the market had been established. >>> >>> >>> IMHO, the personal computer market was a niche specialty field >>> with _relatively_ few units sold until the IBM PC hit the streets >>> _and_ was accepted by the business community. > > >> IMHO your HO is not worth much. Apple sold quite a good number of >> computers *before* the IBM PC. Radio Shack did so well selling their >> computers that they were opening Radio Shack Computer stores. In May of >> 1980, I bought a Radio Shack Color Computer at one of these computer >> stores. The Color Computer had a Motorola 6809 processor in it. > > I still maintain that before the IBM PC, personal computers were > still a specialty niche market. Yes, there were Radio Shack > and Apple computers out there. But in _relative_ terms, the > number of users was still very small. The Apple looked like what it was - a machine for hobbyiests. The multiple ribbon cables coming out of the case, ant the floppy drives in separate boxes, looked like h@ll and added a lot of vulnerability to the system. Many places I saw left the cover off for easy access. The machines got a lot of business use, but they never appeared to be business machines. > > There was certainly an automobile world before Henry Ford came > along with the Model T. But I think most people would agree that > the Model T's low price, durability, and widespread availability > was what revolutionized the automobile field. > > I knew a lot of early purchasers, and many of them bought machines > for hobbyist or experimental reasons. That is, many business users > got them with the attitude, "well, computers are neat, so let's see > what this can do for us." Some business users made very good use > of them--I knew a few who ended up evolving from a retail store > into being a computer consultant for other businesses. But other > business users ended up with a machine that sat on a shelf, perhaps > being slightly used for one small application. > > As others mentioned, the magic letters "IBM" added a great deal > of cachet to the personal computer market. I would also submit > that the wide variety of software and specialty hardware developed > for the IBM PC helped sales (we bought such a unit for a specific > data communications application). In addition, I would submit > that the discount priced clone market, which seemed to sprout > up awfully fast, also contributed to the boom. > > As an aside, it seemed to me most IBM PC's came with CGA, the > coarse color monitor. I thought it looked like crap and hated > using it. I only saw a few units with a monochrome screen, but > they looked a lot better. VGA greatly improved things. CGA was terrible for text, but looked really good with simple graphics like Lotus-1-2-3. Short of having two monitors the Hercules cards represented the best compromize. > > FWIW, at the supermarket, the modern scanner/register has a > screen and for whatever reason, the typeface and style looks > just like the DOS screen of the old days (in large characters.) > -- Pete
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<340159347.543620098.891781.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni12119wmg.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <nejuadhun30mn34o7tvqbs6fhaq9d42m9m@4ax.com> <dce9e1b3-38a3-4815-b8e3-f788819f24d0@googlegroups.com> <p94p0f$uul$1@dont-email.me> <784f741a-e2b9-45db-be4d-3dadc905b18a@googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.28.94.5 with SMTP id s5mr1675105wmb.10.1521927766334; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 14:42:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.139.134 with SMTP id o6ls3288024wra.11.gmail; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 14:42:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.223.171.203 with SMTP id s69mr2916088wrc.14.1521927765395; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 14:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!a12ni12119wmg.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Peter Flass <peter...@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 14:42:45 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 74 Message-ID: <340159347.543620098.891781.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <nejuadhun30mn34o7tvqbs6fhaq9d42m9m@4ax.com> <dce9e1b3-38a3-4815-b8e3-f788819f24d0@googlegroups.com> <p94p0f$uul$1@dont-email.me> <784f741a-e2b9-45db-be4d-3dadc905b18a@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ab326802a357c56a1938221404f4c588"; logging-data="21187"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tTAQWYcN9YTr8QUMk6GNS" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LJiSVyvOGZ76YO38qbZgBedDO6U= sha1:rZhBVmtdq4a+cNMp07zqbkNbw6I= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit