Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621418Re: Old word processors
From: hanc...
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:31
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:31
57 lines
4328 bytes
4328 bytes
On Saturday, March 24, 2018 at 1:51:12 AM UTC-4, Charles Richmond wrote: > > On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 1:43:54 AM UTC-4, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > > > >>> Also the "personal computer" boom started in the 80s. > >> > >> Mid '70s. > >> > >> IBM joined in after the market had been established. > > > > > > IMHO, the personal computer market was a niche specialty field > > with _relatively_ few units sold until the IBM PC hit the streets > > _and_ was accepted by the business community. > IMHO your HO is not worth much. Apple sold quite a good number of > computers *before* the IBM PC. Radio Shack did so well selling their > computers that they were opening Radio Shack Computer stores. In May of > 1980, I bought a Radio Shack Color Computer at one of these computer > stores. The Color Computer had a Motorola 6809 processor in it. I still maintain that before the IBM PC, personal computers were still a specialty niche market. Yes, there were Radio Shack and Apple computers out there. But in _relative_ terms, the number of users was still very small. There was certainly an automobile world before Henry Ford came along with the Model T. But I think most people would agree that the Model T's low price, durability, and widespread availability was what revolutionized the automobile field. I knew a lot of early purchasers, and many of them bought machines for hobbyist or experimental reasons. That is, many business users got them with the attitude, "well, computers are neat, so let's see what this can do for us." Some business users made very good use of them--I knew a few who ended up evolving from a retail store into being a computer consultant for other businesses. But other business users ended up with a machine that sat on a shelf, perhaps being slightly used for one small application. As others mentioned, the magic letters "IBM" added a great deal of cachet to the personal computer market. I would also submit that the wide variety of software and specialty hardware developed for the IBM PC helped sales (we bought such a unit for a specific data communications application). In addition, I would submit that the discount priced clone market, which seemed to sprout up awfully fast, also contributed to the boom. As an aside, it seemed to me most IBM PC's came with CGA, the coarse color monitor. I thought it looked like crap and hated using it. I only saw a few units with a monochrome screen, but they looked a lot better. VGA greatly improved things. FWIW, at the supermarket, the modern scanner/register has a screen and for whatever reason, the typeface and style looks just like the DOS screen of the old days (in large characters.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<784f741a-e2b9-45db-be4d-3dadc905b18a@googlegroups.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c39ni998qta.0!nntp.google.com!k53no453451qtc.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <nejuadhun30mn34o7tvqbs6fhaq9d42m9m@4ax.com> <dce9e1b3-38a3-4815-b8e3-f788819f24d0@googlegroups.com> <p94p0f$uul$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.200.11.77 with SMTP id m13mr6569557qti.0.1521923504788; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:31:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.55.239.14 with SMTP id j14ls7145760qkk.6.gmail; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:31:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.77.133 with SMTP id a127mr20902613qkb.25.1521923504093; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:31:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.148.135 with SMTP id w129mr167372vkd.14.1521923503769; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!c39ni998qta.0!nntp.google.com!k53no453451qtc.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:31:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <p94p0f$uul$1@dont-email.me> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=8.41.192.198; posting-account=WKyNOQkAAACNglsCZiIox1kdy9R-66KH NNTP-Posting-Host: 8.41.192.198 References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <nejuadhun30mn34o7tvqbs6fhaq9d42m9m@4ax.com> <dce9e1b3-38a3-4815-b8e3-f788819f24d0@googlegroups.com> <p94p0f$uul$1@dont-email.me> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <784f741a-e2b9-45db-be4d-3dadc905b18a@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Old word processors From: hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:31:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit