Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #621328Re: Old word processors
From: Carlos E.R.
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:02
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:02
47 lines
3434 bytes
3434 bytes
On 2018-03-18 21:43, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 23:16:45 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >> On 2018-03-17 22:13, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: >>> On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:56:32 -0700 (PDT), hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: >>>> >>>> Not sure of your question. The IBM MT/ST and MC/ST was integrated >>>> with a Selectric typewriter which provided the keyboard and 'printer'. >>>> As others mentioned, they were word processors. >>> >>> I think I understand a word processor is something you edit a text. It >>> assists you by wrapping text and allow modification of characters, like >>> bold. Only *after* you are done editing you would print it out or save it >>> to a file. You could move paragraphs around and often do mail >>> merge. Things a Selectric could not do. >>> >>> The Selectric did not (for my knowledge) had a display. Even if it might >>> had "write ahead" you could not see what you wrote until it was printed >>> on paper. If you made a mistake it was too late. Because of that >>> typewriters soon vanished after word processors were available in the >>> late 70s to early 80s. >>> >>> Which again raises the question: if word processors were around before >>> the 70s, why didn't they supersede typewriters in offices already? >> >> Cost. >> >> You needed a good printer plus a computer, so not cheap at that time. >> And also you needed to train the typist on using a computer and the >> software. > > Of course before the 80s word processors would only exist in large > enterprises. They had one mainframe and a few printers, while the typists > would sit on dumb and relatively cheap terminals. Should not take long to > train a typist for the new technology. > > The advantages of editing on a CRT over a "direct printout" like with > typewriters should have been clear since the 60s already. Yes, obvious to many; but I knew typists than even on the mid nineties balked at using a computer. What happened instead, I think, is that companies stopped hiring typists and had normal people typing their own letters. -- Cheers, Carlos.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8105oe-s4b.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni34147wmi.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <874lld2jxs.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.223.158.210 with SMTP id b18mr697575wrf.29.1521471849239; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:04:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: alt.folklore.computers@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.208.195 with SMTP id z3ls3628112wrh.13.gmail; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:04:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.223.136.108 with SMTP id e41mr1072308wre.17.1521471848262; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!n24ni34147wmi.0!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Old word processors Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:02:32 +0100 Lines: 47 Message-ID: <8105oe-s4b.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> References: <87k1ub4vgf.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <396ec331-b5a3-4137-ac0f-c45471afccb7@googlegroups.com> <87fu4y4d8m.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <dng0oe-0hq.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <874lld2jxs.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net qzmG6ZjWblekddVtKcWWwg7sfv5IQ9URua0Chtio/Q11HBoFgT X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:/ucxAmLyHUoB+b1lNtT5td6jcu8= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 In-Reply-To: <874lld2jxs.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit