Article View: alt.folklore.computers
Article #580(none)
From: Gregd... Commander Krugannal
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:39
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1989 00:39
22 lines
1451 bytes
1451 bytes
Subjct: BALR 12,12
Ok, I have been corrected several times now. As I will
readily admit, it has been years since it was explained to me.
And yes, it does operate as above. But I am still pretty
sure it will continually execute itself. As for the question
as to why it is under revenge, if you get enough of these
processes running from various accounts, it at least WAS
(not sure if you'd notice on the new computer) possible
to make a noticable drag on the system.
There used to be a bug in the accounting system that was
used on the 3081D. Namely the register holding the dollar
amount ($ybil dollar$ as they were called) did not protect
the sign bit. By sending a job to the printer that was
large enough, one could cause one's account to go negative
enough to flip the bit, causing it to go positive. Then one
would have the operator cancel the print job. (Which would
normally be help due to its size.) This bug was fixed after
it was made apparent to the people in charge.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11212.736.forumexp@mts.rpi.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!crdgw1!rpi!rpitsmts!forumexpShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!crdgw1!rpi!rpitsmts!forumexp From: Greg_d...@mts.rpi.edu (Commander Krugannal) Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: (none) Message-ID: <11212.736.forumexp@mts.rpi.edu> Date: 22 Dec 89 00:39:00 GMT Lines: 22 Posted: Fri Dec 22 01:39:00 1989 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit