Re: seagate czy samsung?

Article View: pl.rec.gry.komputerowe.sprzet

Article #290797

Back to pl.rec.gry.komputerowe.sprzet Previous Next

#290797

From: Daniel Chlodzinski
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:11

8 lines
1426 bytes

"Szymon Osiecki" <sosiecki@wytnijto.gazeta-pl> wrote in message

>Jedyny argument dla Samsunga,
> to możliwość włączenia AAM (okupione stratą w czasie dostępu)

Ja bym dodal jeszcze cicha praca nawet bez AAM i niska temp. pracy.

Daniel

Technical Details

Message-ID: <ed0srl$nqr$1@inews.gazeta.pl>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.gazeta.pl!not-for-mail

References:

<ec249c$tip$1@alohha.vectranet.pl> <ec3sjj$5o5$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <ec3til$9ba$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <ec3u0p$l7$1@bmj-lx1.bmj.net.pl> <ec3uqq$8s5$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <Xns0B8389CCA1989@agentopresji.org> <ecvr3g$rbg$2@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <XnsE9857C4728B0F@agentopresji.org>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.gazeta.pl!not-for-mail
From: "Daniel Chlodzinski" <dch@spam.precz>
Newsgroups: pl.rec.gry.komputerowe.sprzet
Subject: Re: seagate czy samsung?
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:11:24 +0200
Organization: "Portal Gazeta.pl -> http://www.gazeta.pl"
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <ed0srl$nqr$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
References: <ec249c$tip$1@alohha.vectranet.pl> <ec3sjj$5o5$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <ec3til$9ba$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> <ec3u0p$l7$1@bmj-lx1.bmj.net.pl> <ec3uqq$8s5$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <Xns0B8389CCA1989@agentopresji.org> <ecvr3g$rbg$2@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <XnsE9857C4728B0F@agentopresji.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host187.softsystem.pl
X-Trace: inews.gazeta.pl 1156839094 24411 195.205.39.187 (29 Aug 2006 08:11:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@agora.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:11:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-Priority: 3
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-User: gwnews123
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message