Article View: pl.rec.gry.komputerowe.sprzet
Article #290783Re: seagate czy samsung?
From: Larus
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:05
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:05
17 lines
1550 bytes
1550 bytes
Indywiduum zwane *MadMan*, w wiadomości
<1pyhyn1mooy64$.oyvdm1l5vzx5$.dlg@40tude.net> wyprodukowało:
> WD, i nie gramobity tylko gigabajty (GiB).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ekhmm, jak już poprawiamy, to poprawnie :P
Gigabajt - GB
Gibibajt - GiB
;)
--
Dawid "Larus" Paszkowski <larus@epf.pl>
Powered by: Viewsonic & Seasonic & Panasonic :)
A64 @ FX-55 | 7800 GT | NF4 | 1 GB RAM | Seagate
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrn.pl.ee9mgs.2rc.larus@larus.one.pl>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.gazeta.pl!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!news.internetia.pl!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!atlantis.news.tpi.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mailReferences:
<ec249c$tip$1@alohha.vectranet.pl> <1pyhyn1mooy64$.oyvdm1l5vzx5$.dlg@40tude.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.gazeta.pl!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!news.internetia.pl!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!atlantis.news.tpi.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail
From: Larus <larus@silesianet.pl>
Newsgroups: pl.rec.gry.komputerowe.sprzet
Subject: Re: seagate czy samsung?
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:05:32 +0200
Organization: Top Secret
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <slrn.pl.ee9mgs.2rc.larus@larus.one.pl>
References: <ec249c$tip$1@alohha.vectranet.pl> <1pyhyn1mooy64$.oyvdm1l5vzx5$.dlg@40tude.net>
Reply-To: larus@epf.pl
NNTP-Posting-Host: ejt234.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: nemesis.news.tpi.pl 1155848979 1370 83.21.161.234 (17 Aug 2006 21:09:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:09:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Face: #<2`krBm0<~pE0dfgbS\?pF\Mew.ysiMw<-+AvYK/txdD0^M.n#8OMepU%-v[_Ormz;]&y0v'(_?v+H;MzTbjNLeJX]7t_!irbs^l0JAOEKL=BLlOWk$A_gSG>ShWfq)zN0^R_<%=,E8kl0)hA=bhrG4?<O7k?r#q$f"<pmM7>b~{N3@[$|>s.
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (pl-1.6.0w) (WindowsXP (iP4)) Hamster/2.1.0.11
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit