Article View: pl.fidonet.bramka
Article #5896Re: Fidonetowe konferencje przez www albo nntp?
From: bakłażan
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:43
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:43
3 lines
1027 bytes
1027 bytes
> ciekawe tak jak nikt nie pisze prawie na konfach to tutaj rozgozala > prawdziwa dyskusja jak za starych czasow hehe :) ja, to piszę tylko, na dupie.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<chlh3e$vni@odak26.prod.google.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: bakłażan <opticaldreams4u@gmail.com> Newsgroups: pl.fidonet.bramka Subject: Re: Fidonetowe konferencje przez www albo nntp? Date: 7 Sep 2004 16:43:42 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 4 Message-ID: <chlh3e$vni@odak26.prod.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: odak26.prod.google.com Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1094600622 29048 127.0.0.1 (7 Sep 2004 23:43:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 23:43:42 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <ch1972$q4q$3@atlantis.news.tpi.pl> User-Agent: G2/0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit