czy cisci wyparly risci

Article View: pl.comp.sys.sun.admin

Article #13457

Back to pl.comp.sys.sun.admin Previous Next

#13457

From: rafalak
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:57

5 lines
1354 bytes

witam ostatnio wpadlem na spec.org i zobaczylem ze wersje pIII o tej
samej czestotliwosci sa lepsze od RISCowych Sparcow.
Czy ktos moze powiedziec do czegfo sie stosuje RISCi ?
Skoro wedlug danych ( mops, mflops i mips ) zawsze wygrywa pIII
czy warto kupic e450 z 4x450Mhz ? na oracle + apache + php

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1151362642.108436.130720@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>

Path:

mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.germany.com!postnews.google.com!p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.germany.com!postnews.google.com!p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "rafalak" <rafalak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: pl.comp.sys.sun.admin
Subject: czy cisci wyparly risci
Date: 26 Jun 2006 15:57:22 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <1151362642.108436.130720@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.10.203.123
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1151362647 9070 127.0.0.1 (26 Jun 2006 22:57:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:57:27 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.10.203.123;   posting-account=jrn3YQ0AAAD6RvykMHL9o8RsBo8OK8O6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit