Article View: pl.comp.sys.novell
Article #222Re: Windows NT or Novell 4.x?
From: dav... David Chamberlain
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:00
54 lines
3017 bytes
3017 bytes
In article <4d116u$p...@news.onramp.net>, we...@onramp.net says... > >I am currently running 100 user 3.12 LAN with heavy DataBase use. I have been confronted >by the Director of IS about going to NT. Any thoughts? I would ask your IS Director what he expects to get from going to NT. We recently made the switch. Before we switched I was given all of these wonderful reasons. Here are some results. Reason: It will perform better. Result: We went from a 66 Mhz 486-DX2 with 64MB of RAM on an EISA buss, a Mylex EISA DAC960 disk array controller and a 3Com EISA FDDI nic; all running NetWare. We went to a 133 Mhz Pentium, also with 64 MB of RAM on a PCI buss, a Mylex PCI DAC960P disk array controller and a Network Peripherals PCI FDDI nic, running Windows NT. It got visibly slower. Reason: It is easier to manage. Result: With NetWare, I used the following programs: SYSCON, PCONSOLE and RCONSOLE; to manage the NetWare server. I could log in and run these programs from any workstation. With NT, I use File Manager, Event Viewer, Server Manager, RAS Admin, Print Manager, User Manager and Performance Monitor. Since all of these are NT programs, I have to come back to my workstation or the server to manage anything. I also have to remember to use Server Manager to resynchronize the Domain everytime I make a change to user settings. I have to use File Manager to manually copy the login script files to all of Domain Controllers, because if I don't, I must wait 5 to 10 minutes for Directory Replication to work. When I want to set user's access to directories on the server, I have to set each directory ACL (Access Control List) individualy. This is because NT ACL's are non-hierachial, and if you use File Manager to copy ACL's to sub-directories, it erases any other ACL's that may be in the directory. Final Word: I could go on for hours. My advice to you is to clearly define the objectives you want to achieve by using Windows NT. Then learn enough about NT to know you are achieving the objects, and understand what you are giving up. -- +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+ | David Chamberlain (dav...@smms.com) | Opinions expressed are soley my | | Network Manager | own and do not neccessarily represent| | Successful Money Management Seminars| the opinions of anyone else at all. | +--------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4d3qao$58d@news.i.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4d116u$p35@news.onramp.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: dav...@smms.com (David Chamberlain) Subject: Re: Windows NT or Novell 4.x? Date: 1996/01/11 Message-ID: <4d3qao$58d@news.i.net> X-Deja-AN: 135016425 references: <4d116u$p35@news.onramp.net> organization: Successful Money Management Seminars mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell,fido.novell,pl.comp.sys.novell,swnet.lans.novell,tw.bbs.comp.novell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit