Article View: pl.comp.sys.novell
Article #226Re: Windows NT or Novell 4.x?
From: Peter Holt
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00
28 lines
1515 bytes
1515 bytes
imt...@compumedia.com (Ian M. Turek) wrote: >dav...@smms.com (David Chamberlain) wrote: > >>Reason: >> It will perform better. > >>Result: >> We went from a 66 Mhz 486-DX2 with 64MB of RAM on an EISA buss, a Mylex EISA >>DAC960 disk array controller and a 3Com EISA FDDI nic; all running NetWare. > >Are you using any client/server based applications? I believe that >with such apps it might be worth considering NT because of its SMP >capabilities. NW4.1 have SMP to!!! And he shod'nt nead SMP any way if he upgraded his like he did. >> We went to a 133 Mhz Pentium, also with 64 MB of RAM on a PCI buss, a Mylex >>PCI DAC960P disk array controller and a Network Peripherals PCI FDDI nic, >>running Windows NT. It got visibly slower. -- Peter Holt MiROi Utbildning i Karlstad KB Tel : +46 54 18 18 50 Bergendorffsgatan 5 Fax : +46 54 18 05 86 652 24 Karlstad E-mail: pe...@kd.miroi.se SWEDEN
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4ddraq$ltl@vega.netg.se>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4d116u$p35@news.onramp.net> <4d3qao$58d@news.i.net> <4d53bp$sri@gandalf.compumedia.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Peter Holt <pe...@kd.miroi.se> Subject: Re: Windows NT or Novell 4.x? Date: 1996/01/15 Message-ID: <4ddraq$ltl@vega.netg.se> X-Deja-AN: 135248495 references: <4d116u$p35@news.onramp.net> <4d3qao$58d@news.i.net> <4d53bp$sri@gandalf.compumedia.com> organization: MiROi Utbildning i Karlstad mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: bit.listserv.novell,fido.novell,pl.comp.sys.novell,swnet.lans.novell,tw.bbs.comp.novell x-mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 16bit) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit