Article View: pl.comp.sys.amiga
Article #66368Re: Dlaczego planar = płynny scrolling?
From: Mateusz Ludwin
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:19
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:19
10 lines
1413 bytes
1413 bytes
Rzecze Mike: > Podsumowując, to nie tryb planar w amidze dawał takie efekty tylko > dodatkowe specjalizowane układy scalone oraz stabilność rozwiązań. Więc co właściwie dawał sam tryb planar? Tylko "tanią" paralaksę i sprajty? -- Omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, without judgment Mateusz Ludwin mateuszl [at] gmail [dot] com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<invr85.5uk.1@teren.hamstera.pl>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.gazeta.pl!not-for-mailReferences:
<intdml.3uk.1@teren.hamstera.pl> <int8gk$46f$1@news.onet.pl> <4da2f978$0$2449$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.gazeta.pl!not-for-mail From: Mateusz Ludwin <nie@spamuj.org> Newsgroups: pl.comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Dlaczego planar = płynny scrolling? Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:19:00 +0200 Organization: WSI Lines: 10 Message-ID: <invr85.5uk.1@teren.hamstera.pl> References: <intdml.3uk.1@teren.hamstera.pl> <int8gk$46f$1@news.onet.pl> <4da2f978$0$2449$65785112@news.neostrada.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: 123-kr1-3.acn.waw.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: inews.gazeta.pl 1302549544 575 213.134.174.123 (11 Apr 2011 19:19:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@agora.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:19:04 +0000 (UTC) X-User: autocurrus-armatus X-Face: W!ajY'U`ruD6nAwGG)zH2ok)I*<9|ew*_goysC^n4Qoa&/wkE>e.IMAKu`U.S"q_GrDV(br m4YRY=l8ssfDL?GVK%)9tZ(EQ/`uN(&$18'-T&OjCu;'1-\VE&YGKVe$W}JgvW't=q)@@<'__PV!Cm V5J)o,VN"$T/$%/83:.=LHyzAt'za~P01t"ze?.$j[|D User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 Hamster/2.1.0.11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit