Re: PCI-SC200 SCSI vs. Adaptec

Article View: pl.comp.pecet

Article #76

#76

From: Piotr Roszkowski
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 18:43

9 lines
903 bytes

In article <199602281816.TAA11697@bull.mimuw.edu.pl> you wrote:
: iCzesc .

: Czy moglbys mi powtornie przyslac adres waszej strony na WWW
: (Ktos mi skasowal "bookmarki").
: Dziekuje .
: : Piotrek
: : piotrs@tch.waw.pl
Przepraszam za smieci .To mial byc list na prywatny adres.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <199602281843.TAA12805@bull.mimuw.edu.pl>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Return-Path: <seter@bull.mimuw.edu.pl>
Received: from bull.mimuw.edu.pl by polonez.man.lodz.pl (8.6.10/8.6.10) id TAA21220; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:40:55 +0100
Received: by bull.mimuw.edu.pl (8.6.8/1.34) id TAA12805; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:43:36 +0100
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 19:43:36 +0100
From: seter@bull.mimuw.edu.pl (Piotr Roszkowski)
Message-ID: <199602281843.TAA12805@bull.mimuw.edu.pl>
To: pecet@man.lodz.pl
Subject: Re: PCI-SC200 SCSI vs. Adaptec
Newsgroups: pl.comp.pecet
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit