Article View: pl.comp.os.winnt
Article #392Re: Workstation czy Server! A co na to Microsoft???
From: Jacques Miller
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 23:49
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 23:49
224 lines
12234 bytes
12234 bytes
Ponizszy tekst pochodzi od Microsoftu. Wynika z niego, ze istnieja duze roznice miedzy
Workstation i Serwerem. Oryginal znajduje sie na:
http://www.microsoft.com/spain/backoffice/doc/ntsvsntw.doc
[Microsoft Home][Products][Search][Support][Shop][Write Us] [Microsoft Home]
[Return to Microsoft Technical Support Home Page]
[Return to Microsoft Technical Support Home Page]
[Use the Support Wizard]
[Check the Directory of Support Options]
[Read the Frequently Asked Questions]
[Search the Knowledge Base]
[Read the Feature Articles]
[Select a Troubleshooter]
[Download a Driver, Patch, or Sample File]
[Browse the Newsgroups]
[Select Web Response for Support]
Best experienced
with
[Microsoft Internet Explorer]
Click here to
start.
Knowledge Base
Windows NT Workstation and Server Optimized For
Different Role
Article ID: Q129593
Creation Date: 30-APR-1995
Revision Date: 03-SEP-1996
The information in this article applies to:
o Microsoft Windows NT Workstation version 3.5
o Microsoft Windows NT Server version 3.5
o Microsoft Windows NT Server version 4.0
o Microsoft Windows NT Workstation version 4.0
SUMMARY
This article discusses the roles for which Windows
NT Workstation and Windows NT Server are
optimized.
MORE INFORMATION
Microsoft optimized both Windows NT Workstation
and Windows NT Server to better serve their
intended purposes. Windows NT Workstation is a
great corporate client for users who need the
power, scalability, fault tolerance, or security
it offers. Windows NT Server is a powerful server
environment for customers who want to leverage its
application server, file and print services, or
remote access capabilities. The following
optimizations were made in Windows NT version 3.5:
o The write-throttling mechanism (the point at
which dirty data is flushed to disk) is
implemented differently for the Windows NT
Server and Windows NT Workstation. This
allows the server to handle server-like loads
and the workstation to handle desktop-like
tasks.
o The internal code that provides the Windows
NT Server server functionality (SRV.SYS) is
less pagable. This leads to better response
times under heavy server-type loads.
o Under Windows NT Workstation, the Windows NT
Virtual DOS Machine (VDM) is pre-loaded for
improved application startup times. Windows
NT Server does not pre-load the VDM, but
instead optimizes server file operations.
o Windows NT Workstation and Windows NT Server
use a different number of system worker
threads and threads for blocking operations.
Windows NT Server is optimized for fast
server type I/O operations and Windows NT
Workstation is optimized for desktop
applications.
o Windows NT Server can be optimized for file
and print server performance or application
server performance, allowing you to tune it
for maximum throughput depending on the type
of server usage. Windows NT Workstation does
not have this feature. Internal testing has
also shown that Windows NT Workstation
performs about the same as Windows NT Server
up to approximately 10 different,
simultaneous inbound user connections. This
enables Windows NT Workstation to function
well in a small peer environment. Windows NT
Server is the correct choice if you want to
deploy a server in a larger environment or
want to scale your network in the future.
These optimizations changed the performance of
Windows NT Workstation when used as a server. As a
result, peer networking is still supported for
basic connectivity between users on a network. You
can still make unlimited outbound connections to
server resources. However, Windows NT Workstation
now supports a maximum of 10 simultaneous inbound
connections. Our research has shown that systems
with this many connections are almost always being
used as dedicated file, print and/or application
servers.
While Windows NT Server can certainly provide
excellent file and print services, it can also be
used extensively as an application server platform
for database and other services. The Windows NT
Server file and print capabilities can be
selectively implemented.
Windows NT Server includes the following
capabilities not available on Windows NT
Workstation:
o Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
server service (Both Windows NT Workstation
and Server have DHCP Protocol)
o Windows Internet Naming Service (WINS)
o Single network logon
o Data protection features (disk striping, RAID
5, disk mirroring)
o Remote Access Server service can handle 255
concurrent incoming calls (Windows NT
Workstation limited to one incoming call)
o Gateway Services for NetWare(GSNW)
o Gateway to NetWare file and print resources
for MS network clients
o Services for Macintosh (allows Macintosh
clients to access file and print resources on
the Windows NT Server, and allows Microsoft
network and Macintosh clients to access
AppleTalk-based printers)
o Netlogon request authentication (for running
logon scripts)
o Account lockout security
o Network Client Administrator
o Administrative tools (Server Manager, User
Manager for Domains)
o Support for remote boot of diskless
workstations (RPL)
Because Windows NT Server is optimized as a server
platform, it is required to run Microsoft
BackOffice products (Systems Management Server,
SNA Server, SQL Server, and the upcoming Exchange
Server).
Microsoft recommends Windows NT Workstation as a
desktop operating system and Windows NT Server as
a server operating system for server applications.
This provides you an environment that is
architecturally very clean, since both the desktop
and server are running the same operating system,
and have the same APIs, etc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS
PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT
DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS
BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT,
INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL
DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN
ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT
ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.
©1996 Microsoft Corporation
KBCategory: kbnetwork
KBSubcategory: ntprotocol NTSrvWkst
Additional reference words: prodnt 3.50 difference comparison 4.00
In article <57namu$cc7@sun1000.pwr.wroc.pl>, ser@serek.arch.pwr.wroc.pl says...
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>Cezariusz Marek <Cezariusz.Marek@ComArch.Krakow.PL> wrote:
>: On 29 Nov 1996 14:15:46 GMT, kkrawcz@ire.pw.edu.pl (Krzysztof
>: Krawczyk) wrote:
>
>: >wiecej oprogramowania- jakiego? itp.). Niedlugo bede musial przeinstalowywac
>: >system - zmiana dysku twardego z 1.2GB na 2.1GB i chcialbym wiedziec czy
>: >pozostac na Serverze czy jednak Workstation. Na Serverze dosc dobrze mi sie
>
>: Je¶li ma pracowaæ jako workstation, to zdecydowanie polecam
>: zainstalowanie NT Workstation (zoptymalizowane pod k±tem pracy
>: interaktywnej). Na serwerze pracuje siê trochê opornie (woli os³ugiwaæ
>: sieæ, procesy w tle).
>
>Piszesz takie ciekawostki, o jakich chyba nawet ludzie Gatesa nie wiedza!
>
>Server od workstation niczym, ale to zupelnie niczym sie nie rozni, poza
>dodatkowym oprogramowaniem, ktore to mozna wylaczyc (a raczej nie wlaczac,
>bo serwer po instalacji pyta, czy mamy siec).
>
>Jesli uwazasz, ze nie mam racji, napisz, prosze, o tej optymalizacji.
>Na czym ona polega? Co to sa procesy w tle (o ktorych mowisz)?
>
>- --ser
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.3i
>Charset: noconv
>
>iQCVAwUBMp8uHjS5h5vvlgEFAQEPQwQA5iEeVdN5nbNJ+Qm5iS0/Z2vdwhJqe+Rs
>gJESUfQ9K3xczFZFrB7ENLBN/DeUQ6Fs+psRgYgKID4JnVGLqwHmNmSSQkIZy89k
>MB4X9bRc1Y1ml+5A2yvCovUZ8wQA1L4ImirqOoa/5Ruowk6b5qG3VKT89zbBYFIF
>2WU8t3eUGCk=
>=gqvf
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<57qh71$9kk@info.nask.pl>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!pingwin.icm.edu.pl!news.icm.edu.pl!news.nask.pl!usenetReferences:
<57mr6i$t5@parnas.mimuw.edu.pl> <329f1311.97651315@news> <57namu$cc7@sun1000.pwr.wroc.pl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!pingwin.icm.edu.pl!news.icm.edu.pl!news.nask.pl!usenet From: jmiller@dsuper.net (Jacques Miller) Newsgroups: pl.comp.os.winnt Subject: Re: Workstation czy Server! A co na to Microsoft??? Date: 30 Nov 1996 23:49:53 GMT Organization: Public NewsServer at NASK N.O.C. Lines: 225 Message-ID: <57qh71$9kk@info.nask.pl> References: <57mr6i$t5@parnas.mimuw.edu.pl> <329f1311.97651315@news> <57namu$cc7@sun1000.pwr.wroc.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: asc-addr-56.dsuper.net Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit