Thread View: pl.comp.os.linux.sieci
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Jakub Chojnacki
Wed, 30 Dec 1998 08:36
3 karty i route
Author: Jakub Chojnacki
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 08:36
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 08:36
76 lines
3563 bytes
3563 bytes
Zrobilem
eth0 : 212.244.53.216 gw 212.244.53.221 netmask 255.255.255.248
eth1 : 212.244.53.200 gw 212.244.53.201 netmask 255.255.255.248
eth2 : 212.244.53.208 gw 212.244.53.209 netmask 255.255.255.248
route add -net 212.244.53.216 gw 212.244.53.221
route add -net 212.244.53.200 gw 212.244.53.201
route add -net 212.244.53.208 gw 212.244.53.209
route add default gw 212.244.53.193
Na 212.2444.53.221 mam www,poczte (linux)
eth0 jest podpiete do internetu (212.244.53.193)
Linux ping-uje .193
Komputer podpiety np. do eth1 ma adres .206 i widzi .201, .221 ale nie
widzi .193.
Co jeszcze moze byc zle ?
Juz raz pytalem sie o to na pl.comp.os.linux , ale nadal mam ten sam
problem.
Prosze o pomoc.
ifconfig zwraca :
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:58 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:58 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:AD:A6:99:2E
inet addr:212.244.53.221 Bcast:212.244.53.223
Mask:255.255.255.248
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:159 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:42 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:3 Base address:0x300
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:AD:C8:66:E7
inet addr:212.244.53.201 Bcast:212.244.53.207
Mask:255.255.255.248
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:105 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:5 Base address:0x320
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:AD:82:4F:AF
inet addr:212.244.53.209 Bcast:212.244.53.215
Mask:255.255.255.248
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:157 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x340
route zwraca :
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
212.244.53.216 * 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 2 eth0
212.244.53.200 * 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth1
212.244.53.208 * 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth2
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
default 212.244.53.193 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 2
eth0
cat /proc/net/ip_forward zwraca
IP firewall forward rules, default 4
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
zwraca 1
Jakub Chojnacki
kuba@drescher.pl
Re: 3 karty i route
Author: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 13:28
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 13:28
35 lines
1977 bytes
1977 bytes
Jakub Chojnacki <kuba@ns.drescher.pl> wrote: > Zrobilem > eth0 : 212.244.53.216 gw 212.244.53.221 netmask 255.255.255.248 > eth1 : 212.244.53.200 gw 212.244.53.201 netmask 255.255.255.248 > eth2 : 212.244.53.208 gw 212.244.53.209 netmask 255.255.255.248 > route add -net 212.244.53.216 gw 212.244.53.221 > route add -net 212.244.53.200 gw 212.244.53.201 > route add -net 212.244.53.208 gw 212.244.53.209 > route add default gw 212.244.53.193 > Na 212.2444.53.221 mam www,poczte (linux) > eth0 jest podpiete do internetu (212.244.53.193) > Linux ping-uje .193 > Komputer podpiety np. do eth1 ma adres .206 i widzi .201, .221 ale nie > widzi .193. Czyli kable sprawne, siec dziala. Nie ma albo forwardingu na 201/221 albo poprawnego defaultroute na 206. Co mowi traceroute *.196 puszczony na *.206 ? Jaki jest *TAM* routing ? Moze *TAM* jest zla maska ? > Co jeszcze moze byc zle ? > Juz raz pytalem sie o to na pl.comp.os.linux , ale nadal mam ten sam > problem. > cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > zwraca 1 Czyli forwarding jest OK. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry@mif.pg.gda.pl tel. (0-58) 347 14 61 Wydz.Fizyki Technicznej i Matematyki Stosowanej Politechniki Gdanskiej
Re: 3 karty i route
Author: Jakub Chojnacki
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 13:56
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 13:56
6 lines
1078 bytes
1078 bytes
Jak robie trace z .206 do .196 to odpowiada .201, .221, i koniec. Jak robie trace z .206 do .210 to odpowiada .201, .210 (dlaczego pominal .209 ??) Jakub Chojnacki kuba@drescher.pl
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads