🚀 go-pugleaf

Sied@r wrote:

> Spotkal sie ktos z takim wpisem ? na googlach raczej skapo.
> A pierwszy raz w zyciu to widzialem. Czym moze byc spowodowany ponizszy
> wpis? oczywiscie LARGE_NAT jest wkompilowany.
> 
> /kernel: ipf_nattable_max reduced to 33596

z /usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.c:
[--tasakiem potraktowane--]

        /* Give me a new nat */
        KMALLOC(nat, nat_t *);
        if (nat == NULL) {
                nat_stats.ns_memfail++;
                /*
                 * Try to automatically tune the max # of entries in the
                 * table allowed to be less than what will cause
kmem_alloc()
                 * to fail and try to eliminate panics due to out of memory
                 * conditions arising.
                 */
                if (ipf_nattable_max > ipf_nattable_sz) {
                        ipf_nattable_max = nat_stats.ns_inuse - 100;
                        printf("ipf_nattable_max reduced to %d\n",
                                ipf_nattable_max);
                }
                return NULL;
        }

-- 
Jakub Wartak
vnull