Re: Chrome bez H.264

Article View: pl.comp.os.advocacy

Article #481107

Back to pl.comp.os.advocacy Previous Next

#481107

From: Bart Ogryczak
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:12

20 lines
2182 bytes

On Jan 12, 9:07 pm, Radosław Gancarz <N0Spam_rad...@hell.pl> wrote:
> Bart Ogryczak <b.ogryc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Czyli wsparcie dla H.264 spad o poni ej po owy udzia u w rynku.
> > > FF+Chrome+Opera w Polsce maj ok. 70%, na wiecie troch mniej ale
> > > zdecydowanie wi cej ni po ow .
>
> > Znacznie mniej. IE wspiera H.264 dopiero od dziewi tki, kt ra p ki co
> > jeszcze jest w becie. Czyli na desktopach udzia przegl darek
> > wspieraj cych H.264 bez dodatk w spad poni ej 3%.
>
> A ile procent przegl darek na desktopach nie ma zainstalowanego
> Flasha

Flash ma się nijak do <video> z HTML5. Co więcej, zwolennicy H.264 w
<video> są jednocześnie przeciwnikami Flasha.

BTW. Chrome ma wbudowany Flash.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <43d25697-e5f2-49da-9feb-bf79feab41bc@r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>

Path:

mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.rmf.pl!nf1.ipartners.pl!ipartners.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1667f9fa-1c3e-46b5-946c-4527df550e80@f8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <slrniirm77.lrm.mikmach@blacher.nos> <0d423da9-d24f-496d-9975-02018d37977c@l8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <igl1m0$81s$1@news.net.icm.edu.pl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.rmf.pl!nf1.ipartners.pl!ipartners.pl!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Bart Ogryczak <b.ogryczak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: pl.comp.os.advocacy
Subject: Re: Chrome bez H.264
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <43d25697-e5f2-49da-9feb-bf79feab41bc@r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
References: <1667f9fa-1c3e-46b5-946c-4527df550e80@f8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <slrniirm77.lrm.mikmach@blacher.nos> <0d423da9-d24f-496d-9975-02018d37977c@l8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <igl1m0$81s$1@news.net.icm.edu.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.100.112.225
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1294913561 31423 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2011 10:12:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.100.112.225; posting-account=1kG_1AoAAADLEA3eucGvO2J-Uo4aPCW_
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/9.0.597.47 Safari/534.13,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message