🚀 go-pugleaf

Piotr Kobzda <pikob@gazeta.pl> napisał(a): 
> 
> I do tego, ja też bym Javy, o której mówimy nie użył.
> 
> Musiałaby to być implementacja JSR-1, np. JamaicaVM 
> (http://www.aicas.com/jamaica.html) -- choć co do jej jakości, musiałbym 
> się najpierw przekonać, a nie mam jak dotąd takich potrzeb, może więc Ty 
> ją wypróbujesz?  (W ewentualnych wynikach jestem oczywiście zainteresowany)

BTW wszystko wskazuje na to Java Real Time za jakis czas zostanie
przetestowane w NASDAQ: 

"Next came the announcement for version 2.0 of the Sun Java Real-Time
specification (Java RTS), along with a tantalizing example of how easily Java
technology-threaded applications can be ported to Java RTS. In this case, he
demonstrated that you can simply change instances of java.lang.Thread to
javax.realtime.RealtimeThread, and you immediately inherit all of the power of
Java RTS technology.

Green then introduced Anna Ewing, CIO of the NASDAQ exchange. NASDAQ is
currently running its trading technology on the Java platform. NASDAQ
pioneered electronic trading 36 years ago, and its systems are considered the
fastest in the industry. In fact, at any point in time, NASDAQ may need to
process over 150,000 transactions per second. With that in mind, Ewing talked
about how the NASDAQ exchange will be converting from Java to Java RTS
technology in the near future and how important compatibility with Java
technology is to NASDAQ's market. "We are currently working with your team on
prototyping on next-generation platform for real-time Java. We love how moving
from Java to Real-Time Java is very easy.""


To bylo na niedawnej JavaOne.

Nawiasem mowiac: 150k transakcji na sekunde. To cholernie duzo.


A.

-- 
Wysłano z serwisu Usenet w portalu Gazeta.pl -> http://www.gazeta.pl/usenet/