Re: tclbytecode (?)

Article View: pl.comp.lang.tcl

Article #555

#555

From: ZB
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:51

4 lines
1025 bytes

A gdyby przyszło co do czego: czy warto zdecydować się na "Pro Studio"?
Zasadniczo sam TDK wydawałby się chyba wystarczający...
-- 
ZB

Technical Details

Message-ID: <slrnfq4gnb.ggr.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.astercity.net!news.aster.pl!not-for-mail

References:

<slrnfphil1.5fu.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net> <fncdlb$ogj$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <slrnfpmvqm.903.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net> <fnnbqd$orp$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <slrnfpup46.b4j.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net> <fns1kq$j8p$2@node1.news.atman.pl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.astercity.net!news.aster.pl!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: pl.comp.lang.tcl
From: ZB <zbREMOVE_THIS@AND_THISispid.com.pl>
Subject: Re: tclbytecode (?)
References: <slrnfphil1.5fu.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net> <fncdlb$ogj$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <slrnfpmvqm.903.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net> <fnnbqd$orp$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <slrnfpup46.b4j.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net> <fns1kq$j8p$2@node1.news.atman.pl>
Message-ID: <slrnfq4gnb.ggr.zbREMOVE_THIS@sarge.my.own.domain.no-net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)
Date: 31 Jan 2008 21:51:36 GMT
Lines: 4
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Jan 2008 21:51:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.236.6.157
X-Trace: 1201816296 mamut2.aster.pl 6124 77.236.6.157:39223
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message