Re: DynamicArray kontra StaticArray

Article View: pl.comp.lang.pascal

Article #93037

Back to pl.comp.lang.pascal Previous Next

#93037

From: Mirek
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:51

18 lines
1438 bytes

On czw, 01 lip 2010 11:58:10 in article news:<60b5.000013db.4c2c66b2@newsgate.onet.pl>
webmajsterek@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
> 
> kompilacja dla pentium4 , wylaczone sprawdzanie zakresow , optymalizacja 3 
> stopnia .
> 
> u mnie dodawanie dynamicznej tablicy  dla 15  miliardow powtorzzen konczy sie o 
> 25 % szybciej .
> pentla dla openArray zajmuje 33 sek a dla defArray 44 sek .

SOA#1

DefArray real 35.84 user 35.61 sys 0.01
DefArray real 34.82 user 34.50 sys 0.00
DefArray real 34.75 user 34.49 sys 0.01
OpenArray real 34.20 user 34.00 sys 0.00
OpenArray real 37.50 user 37.36 sys 0.00
OpenArray real 34.75 user 34.75 sys 0.00

Technical Details

Message-ID: <i0i30n$6lp$1@inews.gazeta.pl>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.gazeta.pl!not-for-mail

References: <60b5.000013db.4c2c66b2@newsgate.onet.pl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.gazeta.pl!not-for-mail
From: Mirek <pisz_na.mirek@dionizos.zind.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl>
Newsgroups: pl.comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: DynamicArray kontra StaticArray
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:51:35 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: WUT
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <i0i30n$6lp$1@inews.gazeta.pl>
References: <60b5.000013db.4c2c66b2@newsgate.onet.pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: infrared.zind.ikem.pwr.wroc.pl
X-Trace: inews.gazeta.pl 1277988695 6841 156.17.14.223 (1 Jul 2010 12:51:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@agora.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:51:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-User: memeka
User-Agent: tin/1.9.3-20080506 ("Dalintober") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.32-5-686 (i686))
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message