Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
Article #585LHX compared to Gunship 2000?
From: Brad Taplin
Date: Mon, 18 May 1992 04:21
Date: Mon, 18 May 1992 04:21
20 lines
1324 bytes
1324 bytes
Hello. Been using Gunship 2000 lately. Play is nice, but I've a few gripes and wonder if another flight simulator might do better in these areas: 1. Screen updates are only a few per second it seems. Useable but not what I'd call realistic. Too bad. 2. When I die I wanna start again quick, not sit idle tolerating the ridiculous debriefing biz! 3. Far too many damned info and idiot screens make starting the game downright monotonous. I almost always use an Apache, with Hellfires or TOWs, and Stingers, and plan as I go. Enough pretty intros! Anyone experienced both? Alternatives? Suggestions? Thanks. -- bta...@silver.ucs.indiana.edu or simply bta...@ucs.indiana.edu will appreciate your intelligent suggestions, anecdotes, comments & offers.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992May17.232146.29725@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!bta...@silver.ucs.indiana.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!bta...@silver.ucs.indiana.edu From: Brad Taplin <bta...@silver.ucs.indiana.edu> Subject: LHX compared to Gunship 2000? Message-ID: <1992May17.232146.29725@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> Summary: Anyone used both? Alternatives? Sender: bta...@silver.ucs.indiana.edu Organization: Indiana University Date: Sun, 17 May 1992 23:21:36 -0500 Lines: 20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit