Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
Article #66788Re: VHS versus Betamax (was: Let's unite to destroy Microsoft!)
From: pet... Loren Petrich
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 00:00
52 lines
2997 bytes
2997 bytes
In article <330332...@pass.wayne.edu>, Michael Edelman <m...@pass.wayne.edu> wrote: >Loren Petrich wrote: >Your English example, even if true, would not be a particularly good >one. In what way does it demonstrate path dependancy? The atrocious character of English spelling is a function of history, and does not represent some Panglossian optimum. English spelling is so bad because it is a mixture of different spelling conventions (Anglo-Saxon and Norman) and a lot of frozen history (silent letters -- some of them are a result of analogies, however). The result is a semi-ideographic system. >I'd like to hear your examples. Please name a few. >I'd be surprised if you could, frankly; The counter examples just don't >exist. There are many languages that do a *much* better job at spelling-pronunciation mapping. Finnish is supposed to be one of the best. Why don't you study some other languages some time -- you'll see. [defense of ideographic spelling...] Mr. Edelman, I'm surprised that you aren't wishing that English was written in Chinese characters. I think that what we are seeing with English spelling is psychological denial -- some people can't bear the thought that it could be improved on, so they deny that it can. Much as with M$ software. And on my list of numerals, why is it that we have some names for them and not others? Why "one, two, three", instead of "pam, lok, veh"? Why is English closest to German and Swedish, and somewhat less close to French or Spanish or Latin or Russian or Greek or Gaelic or Welsh or Hindi or Sanskrit, and resembling very little, if at all, Finnish or Hungarian or Turkish or Hebrew or Arabic or Tamil or Chinese or Japanese? >> So this is the best of all possible worlds, right? >Straw man arguments don't cut it here. I don't think I or anyone has >made that claim. That's what all those who celebrate M$'s market dominance are implying, that M$ is the best of all possible major software companies. -- Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh pet...@netcom.com And a fast train My home page: http://www.webcom.com/petrich/home.html Mirrored at: ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/pe/petrich/home.html
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<petrichE5L3p2.Btu@netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32DB2690.3533@geocities.com> <33023502.774B@pass.wayne.edu> <petrichE5IMJn.Jrq@netcom.com> <3303320F.696F@pass.wayne.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: pet...@netcom.com (Loren Petrich) Subject: Re: VHS versus Betamax (was: Let's unite to destroy Microsoft!) Date: 1997/02/14 Message-ID: <petrichE5L3p2.Btu@netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 218713806 Sender: pet...@netcom18.netcom.com References: <32DB2690.3533@geocities.com> <33023502.774B@pass.wayne.edu> <petrichE5IMJn.Jrq@netcom.com> <3303320F.696F@pass.wayne.edu> Organization: Netcom Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.acorn.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt,comp.os.linux.network,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games,comp.security.misc,rec.aviation.simulators,comp.sys.palmtops,alt.2600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit