Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
Article #66781Re: VHS versus Betamax (was: Let's unite to destroy Microsoft!)
From: rcou... Ryan John Cousineau
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 00:00
46 lines
2911 bytes
2911 bytes
In article <3300C7...@pass.wayne.edu>, Michael Edelman <m...@pass.wayne.edu> wrote: >Mark Sutton wrote: >> >> Ketil Z Malde <ke...@imr.no> writes: >> >> This is exactly correct. And why was "the combined marketing of just about >> every other electronics manufacturer" behind VHS? Because JVC (the inventor >> of VHS) licensed the technology FOR FREE to any manufacturer demonstrating >> that it was adhering to a certain minimum compatibility standard. >> >> The PC enjoyed it's success for exactly the same reason. IBM let any >> manufacturer copy the architecture FOR FREE. Had either Apple or Comadore >> (Manufacturer of the Amiga) done the same thing, instead of leaving >> their architecture proprietary, one of those architectures may very well >> have emerged as the standard. > >Bingo. Amazing how many people come up with nonsense like the "path >dependancy" arguments when the facts are so clearly laid out. > >--mike Quick history lesson though: IBM didn't "let" anyone copy the architecture for free. They, for reasons of cost, built a very open platform with a BIOS that was relatively easy to reverse-engineer (as opposed to the Apple II or Mac ROMs, the former being clearly off-limits after a lawsuit or two, and the latter never really being sucessfully cloned; I don't understand the reasons precisely). Anyways, IBM never licensed its platform or any sort of nonsense like that. They just unwittingly built a very clonable platform. They eventually lost control of the platform specs too, about the time the first 386s came out. Nowadays Intel has as much "control" over the hardware as anyone, and Microsoft is pretty clearly dictating the path of the software. I do think that Apple's decision to license the Mac's hardware was the right one, and for more or less the reasons the other posters gave above. Open is generally more fun than proprietary. In the case of Linux, it may be a little too fun for the average consumer. Share and Enjoy, -- Ryan Cousineau, Fool, Catholic, Motorcyclist Errant. rcou...@sfu.ca http://www.sfu.ca/~rjcousin/ "I hate you. And you can quote me on that" --Paul Jungwirth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5dqji5$nhv@morgoth.sfu.ca>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32DB2690.3533@geocities.com> <KETIL-ytqrais4xp5.fsf@imr.no> <32FF2AD9.AB4F4AD@laitram.com> <3300C7E5.6575@pass.wayne.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: rcou...@sfu.ca (Ryan John Cousineau) Subject: Re: VHS versus Betamax (was: Let's unite to destroy Microsoft!) Date: 1997/02/11 Message-ID: <5dqji5$nhv@morgoth.sfu.ca> X-Deja-AN: 218085726 references: <32DB2690.3533@geocities.com> <KETIL-ytqrais4xp5.fsf@imr.no> <32FF2AD9.AB4F4AD@laitram.com> <3300C7E5.6575@pass.wayne.edu> organization: Simon Fraser University newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.acorn.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt,comp.os.linux.network,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games,comp.security.misc,rec.aviation.simulators,comp.sys.palmtops,alt.2600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit