Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Tanzen
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29
We are all probably waiting for Dominions 4.
Author: Tanzen
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29
4 lines
1256 bytes
1256 bytes
I know I am. -- Pirouette
Re: We are all probably waiting for Dominions 4.
Author: Tanzen
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:30
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:30
11 lines
1652 bytes
1652 bytes
On 7/10/2013 2:29 AM, Tanzen wrote: > I know I am. > One thing though I am willing to wait for is a solid game. I think Space Empires V might have been rushed because it is not as neat and clean as Space Empires IV. I want Dominions IV to be well-tested and thorough. -- Pirouette
Re: We are all probably waiting for Dominions 4.
Author: Gandalf Parker
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:37
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:37
7 lines
1231 bytes
1231 bytes
Tanzen <waldby.jules@yahoo.com> contributed wisdom to news:3bidnT- E8OPKhkDMnZ2dnUVZ5sqdnZ2d@giganews.com: > I know I am. > http://www.Illwinter.com/dom4/index.html
Re: We are all probably waiting for Dominions 4.
Author: Peter Huebner
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:47
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:47
22 lines
1884 bytes
1884 bytes
In article <3bidnT6E8OMzhkDMnZ2dnUVZ5sqdnZ2d@giganews.com>, waldby.jules@yahoo.com says... > > On 7/10/2013 2:29 AM, Tanzen wrote: > > I know I am. > > > > One thing though I am willing to wait for is a solid game. I think > Space Empires V might have been rushed because it is not as neat and > clean as Space Empires IV. I want Dominions IV to be well-tested and > thorough. Hmmm, I actually thought, after a little bit of initial 'wtf' that SE 5 was not a bad looking, or bad playing game. The real problem is that the gfx programming has some shortcoming that means it runs like pigshit flowing down a straw on modern OS or cpus, not sure which one is the problem. SE 4 runs a lot better. I can't remember right now if I've tried SE 5 on Win 8 yet, on Win7_64 it's unplayable. Wish someone would figure out how to fix it. -P.
Re: We are all probably waiting for Dominions 4.
Author: Gandalf Parker
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:40
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:40
30 lines
2482 bytes
2482 bytes
Peter Huebner <no.one@this.address> contributed wisdom to news:MPG.2c5d290e1a36f60b989736@news.individual.net: > In article <3bidnT6E8OMzhkDMnZ2dnUVZ5sqdnZ2d@giganews.com>, > waldby.jules@yahoo.com says... >> >> On 7/10/2013 2:29 AM, Tanzen wrote: >> > I know I am. >> > >> >> One thing though I am willing to wait for is a solid game. I think >> Space Empires V might have been rushed because it is not as neat and >> clean as Space Empires IV. I want Dominions IV to be well-tested and >> thorough. > > Hmmm, I actually thought, after a little bit of initial 'wtf' that SE 5 > was not a bad looking, or bad playing game. The real problem is that the > gfx programming has some shortcoming that means it runs like pigshit > flowing down a straw on modern OS or cpus, not sure which one is the > problem. SE 4 runs a lot better. I can't remember right now if I've > tried SE 5 on Win 8 yet, on Win7_64 it's unplayable. Wish someone would > figure out how to fix it. I never did like SEV as well as SEIV. I think going eye-candy killed off the modding that made SEIV work. As far as Dominions 4 I am sure it will be well tested and thoughrough. They did good with Dom3. Altho it is a completely new test crew. So I dont know.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads