🚀 go-pugleaf

On Apr 2, 1:46 am, Static Void <s...@ticvoid.com> wrote:
> Nice compilation listed by category, lots of indie titles, multiplatform
> games at the end:
>
> http://adrianwerner.wordpress.com/games-of-2010/

A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can someone
even come close to enjoying all the goodness?

Carl Lundstedt
UNL

clundst wrote:

> On Apr 2, 1:46 am, Static Void <s...@ticvoid.com> wrote:
>>
>> http://adrianwerner.wordpress.com/games-of-2010/
> 
> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can someone
> even come close to enjoying all the goodness?

There are going to be new versions of Civilization, Jagged Alliance,
Starcraft and Disciples all coming out this year?  I might as well dump
my girlfriend and quit my job right now, save everyone some time ;-)

I'm pleasantly surprised with the large number of strategy and adventure 
games, I guess those will always be the stronghold of PC gaming.

clundst typed:
>> http://adrianwerner.wordpress.com/games-of-2010/
> 
> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?

I reckon! That page is crazy freaking long - needs separate pages
for each genre. Lots of stuff there I'm interested in as I tend to
play a bit of everything except for turn-based strategy.


-- 
};> Matt v3.3 <:{

On 02/04/2010 4:14 PM, Zank Frappa wrote:

> There are going to be new versions of Civilization, Jagged Alliance,
> Starcraft and Disciples all coming out this year?  I might as well dump
> my girlfriend and quit my job right now, save everyone some time ;-)

JA3 is being done by Russians so the humor may not translate to English 
too well. It didn't in that last attempt at a JA2 clone (Hired Guns). At 
least the Silent Storm engine gives promise for a good tactical mode.

"Matt v3.3" wrote
> clundst typed:
>>> http://adrianwerner.wordpress.com/games-of-2010/

>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?

> I reckon! That page is crazy freaking long - needs separate pages
> for each genre. Lots of stuff there I'm interested in as I tend to
> play a bit of everything except for turn-based strategy.

I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.

After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.

On Apr 3, 1:54 pm, "Vince" <vi...@nospam.co.uk> wrote:
> "Matt v3.3" wrote
>
> > clundst typed:
> >>>http://adrianwerner.wordpress.com/games-of-2010/
> >> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
> >> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
> > I reckon! That page is crazy freaking long - needs separate pages
> > for each genre. Lots of stuff there I'm interested in as I tend to
> > play a bit of everything except for turn-based strategy.
>
> I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.
>
> After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.

Ok, that's funny right there.
Carl Lundstedt
UNL

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic Static Void <st@ticvoid.com> wrote:
> Nice compilation listed by category, lots of indie titles, multiplatform 
> games at the end:
> 
> http://adrianwerner.wordpress.com/games-of-2010/

Uh, some of those came out last year didn't they?  Like Star Trek Online?  
And Assassain's Creed II was on consoles last fall, even though the PC 
version just arrived about a month ago.

Can you really call an add-on a whole new game?

Other titles are already on the do-not-buy-list due to DRM, like C&C 4,
Assassain's Creed 2, and Settlers.

If anything, this list just proves that the days of retail PC gaming are 
practically dead.  Over half the games are from "indie" companies.

I assume we're just supposed to ignore the final list of games since they're 
multiplatform releases, which doesn't make them exclusives.

And that's assuming all these games even arrive.  Beyond Good & Evil 2 has 
no official release date - it's not known if the game is still under 
development after last year's rounds of layoffs and cutbacks.  Six Days in 
Fallujah was cancelled several months ago, shortly after its 
announcement.  Aliens: Colonial Marines has also been cancelled, and those 
are just the 3 I noticed right away.  I'm sure there are similar errors in 
the PC exclusives listed above.


-- 
It's not broken.  It's...advanced.

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic clundst <clundst@gmail.com> wrote:
> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can someone
> even come close to enjoying all the goodness?

Simple.

First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip into 
2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.

Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just suck 
or won't be worth your while.

Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the games 
you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like sports games. 
It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't like them.  What 
you're left with (1/8th) represents a good estimatation of your shopping 
list for 2010.

-- 
It's not broken.  It's...advanced.

On 03/04/2010 11:54 AM, Vince wrote:

> I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.
>
> After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.

Thanks for sharing!

On 05/04/2010 12:03 PM, Doug Jacobs wrote:

> Uh, some of those came out last year didn't they?  Like Star Trek Online?
> And Assassain's Creed II was on consoles last fall, even though the PC
> version just arrived about a month ago.

Yea, some have already been released. What I found questionable is Steel 
Beasts 2. The develioper said they put that on the back burner a long 
time ago and they have mentioned nothing about it being released in 
2010. I would be hapy if it was but doubt it will be.

Juarez wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 11:54 AM, Vince wrote:
> 
>> I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.
>>
>> After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.
> 
> Thanks for sharing!

But then he didn't share, at least for a while.  Then he did again.

-- 
-Don

www.cosmoslair.com

On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:06:02 -0500, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure, Doug
Jacobs wrote: 

>In comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic clundst <clundst@gmail.com> wrote:
>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can someone
>> even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>
>Simple.
>
>First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip into 
>2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
>
>Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just suck 
>or won't be worth your while.
>
>Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the games 
>you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like sports games. 
>It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't like them.  What 
>you're left with (1/8th) represents a good estimatation of your shopping 
>list for 2010.

IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.

-- 
Zag

No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had
spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten

On Apr 5, 8:20 pm, Zaghadka <zagha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:06:02 -0500, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure, Doug
>
>
>
> Jacobs wrote:
> >In comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic clundst <clun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can someone
> >> even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>
> >Simple.
>
> >First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip into
> >2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
>
> >Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just suck
> >or won't be worth your while.
>
> >Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the games
> >you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like sports games.
> >It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't like them.  What
> >you're left with (1/8th) represents a good estimatation of your shopping
> >list for 2010.
>
> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
>
> --
> Zag
>
> No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had
> spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten

It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
burned.  That last piece is what you want."

Carl Lundstedt
UNL

clundst wrote:
> Zaghadka <zagha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Doug Jacobs wrote:
>>> clundst wrote: 
>>>
>>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
>>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>>
>>> Simple.
>>
>>> First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip
>>> in to 2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
>>> Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just
>>> suck or won't be worth your while.
>>
>>> Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the
>>> games you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like
>>> sports games. It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't
>>> like them. What you're left with (1/8th) represents a good 
>>> estimatation of your shopping list for 2010. 
>
>> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
> 
> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
> burned.  That last piece is what you want."

Until you find a pubic hair buried in it.

"Vince" <vince@nospam.co.uk> writes:

> "Matt v3.3" wrote
>> clundst typed:
>>>> http://adrianwerner.wordpress.com/games-of-2010/
>
>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>
>> I reckon! That page is crazy freaking long - needs separate pages
>> for each genre. Lots of stuff there I'm interested in as I tend to
>> play a bit of everything except for turn-based strategy.
>
> I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.
>
> After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.
>

I had toast for breakfast.

Zank Frappa wrote:
> clundst wrote:
>> Zaghadka <zagha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Doug Jacobs wrote:
>>>> clundst wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
>>>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>>>> Simple.
>>>> First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip
>>>> in to 2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
>>>> Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just
>>>> suck or won't be worth your while.
>>>> Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the
>>>> games you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like
>>>> sports games. It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't
>>>> like them. What you're left with (1/8th) represents a good 
>>>> estimatation of your shopping list for 2010. 
>>> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
>> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
>> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
>> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
>> burned.  That last piece is what you want."
> 
> Until you find a pubic hair buried in it.
> 
> 

Which they charge extra for.

-- 
-Don

www.cosmoslair.com

Juarez wrote:
> On 05/04/2010 12:03 PM, Doug Jacobs wrote:
> 
>> Uh, some of those came out last year didn't they?  Like Star Trek Online?
>> And Assassain's Creed II was on consoles last fall, even though the PC
>> version just arrived about a month ago.
> 
> Yea, some have already been released. What I found questionable is Steel 
> Beasts 2. The develioper said they put that on the back burner a long 
> time ago and they have mentioned nothing about it being released in 
> 2010. I would be hapy if it was but doubt it will be.

Yeah, the whole list was largely a mixture of the already-released, 
vapourware, console ports, and sequels. Very little new and original for 
the PC.

On 05/04/2010 8:03 PM, clundst wrote:

> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
> burned.  That last piece is what you want."
>
> Carl Lundstedt
> UNL

Once you put anchovies on even one slice of the pizza the whole pizza is 
ruined because the fish flavor and odor of anchovies is so strong that 
it permeates the rest of the pizza even if there are no anchovies on the 
other slices.

Doug Jacobs  <djacobs@rawbw.com> wrote:
>Uh, some of those came out last year didn't they?  Like Star Trek Online?  

Star Trek Online came out this year in February.

					Ross Ridge

-- 
 l/  //	  Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ 
 db  //	  

rochrist <rochrist@charter.net> wrote:
> Yeah, the whole list was largely a mixture of the already-released, 
> vapourware, console ports, and sequels. Very little new and original for 
> the PC.

Well, to be honest, much of the console market is nothing but sequels.

Truly original games are far and inbetween, and even when something 
original DOES pop up, it often doesn't do very well, just reinforcing the 
idea that sequels are the way to go.  It's sad that the game industry is 
becoming more and more like the movie industry every year.

-- 
It's not broken.  It's...advanced.

In article <0pNun.82655$O44.74485@newsfe03.ams2>,
 "Vince" <vince@nospam.co.uk> wrote:

> "Walter Mitty" wrote
> > "Vince" writes:
> 
> >> I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.
> 
> >> After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.
> 
> > I had toast for breakfast.
> 
> Whoosh.

Yes, but surely you didn't expect everyone to get the joke? ;-)

/ Rikard

"Vince" <vince@nospam.co.uk> writes:

> "Walter Mitty" wrote
>> "Vince" writes:
>
>>> I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.
>
>>> After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.
>
>> I had toast for breakfast.
>
> Whoosh.
>

Oh dear. I think you missed the fact it was someone else "turn" to post
something trite.

"Vince" <vince@nospam.co.uk> writes:

> "Walter Mitty" wrote
>> "Vince" writes:
>
>>> "Walter Mitty" wrote
>>>> "Vince" writes:
>
>>>>> I used to play 'turn-based strategy' games, but then I stopped.
>
>>>>> After a while I played them for a bit more, then I stopped again.
>
>>>> I had toast for breakfast.
>
>>> Whoosh.
>
>> Oh dear. I think you missed the fact it was someone else "turn" to post
>> something trite.
>
> But it always seems to be *your* turn.
>

So that'll be a whooshing sound you heard right there.

On Apr 2, 4:14 pm, Zank Frappa <em...@mail.com> wrote:
> I'm pleasantly surprised with the large number of strategy and adventure
> games, I guess those will always be the stronghold of PC gaming.

And flight simulators requiring lots of buttons or keyboard hot keys
too.

Don Freeman wrote:
> Zank Frappa wrote:
>> clundst wrote:
>>> Zaghadka <zagha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Doug Jacobs wrote:
>>>>> clundst wrote:
>>>>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
>>>>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>>>>> Simple.
>>>>> First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip
>>>>> in to 2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
>>>>> Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just
>>>>> suck or won't be worth your while.
>>>>> Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the
>>>>> games you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like
>>>>> sports games. It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't
>>>>> like them. What you're left with (1/8th) represents a good 
>>>>> estimatation of your shopping list for 2010. 
>>>> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
>>> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
>>> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
>>> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
>>> burned.  That last piece is what you want."
>>
>> Until you find a pubic hair buried in it.
>>

> Which they charge extra for.

lol, thanks guys this thread has made me laugh hard. Needed that today.

Ceo-

p.s. who the hell puts NUTS on a pizza?!

Ceowulf wrote:
> Don Freeman wrote:
>> Zank Frappa wrote:
>>> clundst wrote:
>>>> Zaghadka <zagha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Doug Jacobs wrote:
>>>>>> clundst wrote:
>>>>>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
>>>>>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>>>>>> Simple.
>>>>>> First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip
>>>>>> in to 2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
>>>>>> Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just
>>>>>> suck or won't be worth your while.
>>>>>> Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the
>>>>>> games you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like
>>>>>> sports games. It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't
>>>>>> like them. What you're left with (1/8th) represents a good 
>>>>>> estimatation of your shopping list for 2010. 
>>>>> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
>>>> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
>>>> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
>>>> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
>>>> burned.  That last piece is what you want."
>>>
>>> Until you find a pubic hair buried in it.
>>>
> 
>> Which they charge extra for.
> 
> lol, thanks guys this thread has made me laugh hard. Needed that today.
> 
> Ceo-
> 
> p.s. who the hell puts NUTS on a pizza?!
> 

How do you think the pubic hair got there?

-- 
-Don

www.cosmoslair.com

On Apr 20, 11:25 am, Ceowulf <askif...@need.toknow> wrote:
> Don Freeman wrote:
> > Zank Frappa wrote:
> >> clundst wrote:
> >>> Zaghadka <zagha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Doug Jacobs wrote:
> >>>>> clundst wrote:
> >>>>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
> >>>>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
> >>>>> Simple.
> >>>>> First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip
> >>>>> in to 2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
> >>>>> Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just
> >>>>> suck or won't be worth your while.
> >>>>> Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the
> >>>>> games you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like
> >>>>> sports games. It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't
> >>>>> like them. What you're left with (1/8th) represents a good
> >>>>> estimatation of your shopping list for 2010.
> >>>> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
> >>> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
> >>> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
> >>> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
> >>> burned.  That last piece is what you want."
>
> >> Until you find a pubic hair buried in it.
>
> > Which they charge extra for.
>
> lol, thanks guys this thread has made me laugh hard. Needed that today.
>
> Ceo-
>
> p.s. who the hell puts NUTS on a pizza?!

The same people who think XCOM should be an FPS.

Carl Lundstedt
UNL

On Apr 20, 11:27 am, Don Freeman <freem...@cosmoslair.com> wrote:
> Ceowulf wrote:
> > Don Freeman wrote:
> >> Zank Frappa wrote:
> >>> clundst wrote:
> >>>> Zaghadka <zagha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Doug Jacobs wrote:
> >>>>>> clundst wrote:
> >>>>>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
> >>>>>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
> >>>>>> Simple.
> >>>>>> First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip
> >>>>>> in to 2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
> >>>>>> Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just
> >>>>>> suck or won't be worth your while.
> >>>>>> Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the
> >>>>>> games you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like
> >>>>>> sports games. It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't
> >>>>>> like them. What you're left with (1/8th) represents a good
> >>>>>> estimatation of your shopping list for 2010.
> >>>>> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
> >>>> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
> >>>> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
> >>>> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
> >>>> burned.  That last piece is what you want."
>
> >>> Until you find a pubic hair buried in it.
>
> >> Which they charge extra for.
>
> > lol, thanks guys this thread has made me laugh hard. Needed that today.
>
> > Ceo-
>
> > p.s. who the hell puts NUTS on a pizza?!
>
> How do you think the pubic hair got there?
>
> --
> -Don
>
> www.cosmoslair.com

It's going back...way back....IT'S OUTTA HERE!

nice one.

Carl Lundstedt
UNL

On 4/20/2010 11:42 AM, clundst wrote:
> On Apr 20, 11:25 am, Ceowulf<askif...@need.toknow>  wrote:
>> Don Freeman wrote:
>>> Zank Frappa wrote:
>>>> clundst wrote:
>>>>> Zaghadka<zagha...@hotmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>>> Doug Jacobs wrote:
>>>>>>> clundst wrote:
>>>>>>>> A great list/lineup.  It's kinda demoralizing though.  How can
>>>>>>>> someone even come close to enjoying all the goodness?
>>>>>>> Simple.
>>>>>>> First, cut the list in half.  These are games that will either slip
>>>>>>> in to 2011 (or later) or just get cancelled outright.
>>>>>>> Now cut the list in half again.  These are the games that will just
>>>>>>> suck or won't be worth your while.
>>>>>>> Finally cut this list in half - the games you cut represent the
>>>>>>> games you're just not interested in.  For instance, I don't like
>>>>>>> sports games. It has nothing to do with how good it is, I just don't
>>>>>>> like them. What you're left with (1/8th) represents a good
>>>>>>> estimatation of your shopping list for 2010.
>>>>>> IOW: Imagine an huge, delicious pizza and you can only eat one slice.
>>>>> It sounds more like "Imagine ordering a pizza, half comes to the
>>>>> table, the rest is still in the oven.  One quarter of the pizza is
>>>>> covered in pistashios and anchovies, one pieces looks ok, but is
>>>>> burned.  That last piece is what you want."
>>
>>>> Until you find a pubic hair buried in it.
>>
>>> Which they charge extra for.
>>
>> lol, thanks guys this thread has made me laugh hard. Needed that today.
>>
>> Ceo-
>>
>> p.s. who the hell puts NUTS on a pizza?!
>
> The same people who think XCOM should be an FPS.
>
> Carl Lundstedt
> UNL

I hope you're kidding.

"Gemini" <scottz@websagacity.com> wrote
> On 4/20/2010 11:42 AM, clundst wrote:
>> Ceowulf<askif...@need.toknow>  wrote:
>>
>>> p.s. who the hell puts NUTS on a pizza?!
>>
>> The same people who think XCOM should be an FPS.
>>
> I hope you're kidding.

That ain't no joke, brother...

"X-Com, the classic 90's turn-based strategy game pitting mankind against
alien invaders, is set to make a comeback as a first-person shooter,
courtesy of the 2K studios behind BioShock 2."

http://kotaku.com/5516654/x+com-is-back 

"Gemini" <scottz@websagacity.com> wrote
> On 4/20/2010 11:42 AM, clundst wrote:
>> Ceowulf<askif...@need.toknow>  wrote:
>>
>>> p.s. who the hell puts NUTS on a pizza?!
>>
>> The same people who think XCOM should be an FPS.
>>
> I hope you're kidding.

That ain't no joke, brother...

"X-Com, the classic 90's turn-based strategy game pitting mankind against
alien invaders, is set to make a comeback as a first-person shooter,
courtesy of the 2K studios behind BioShock 2."

http://kotaku.com/5516654/x+com-is-back