Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)

Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by jma... Joseph T. Malloy Sun, 16 Jul 1995 00:00

#1740

Author: jma... Joseph T. Malloy
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 00:00

13 lines
1365 bytes

In article <DBpq5...@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> rjva...@cantor.math.uwaterloo.ca (Rob Vanden Heuvel) writes:
>> Yep this is the point everyone seems to have missed. MS have included a 
>> facility for games in Win95. When developers start writing games for 
>> Win95 we should see a great improvement over games written for DOS.
>> Can't see games being written specificaly for OS/2............!!
>
>What you may have missed is that we have yet to be introduced to ANY game
>for Win95 which performs better than under plain old DOS.  Even Microsoft's
>own attempt at a game (called "Hover") was a dog.

"Hover" is likely a demonstration of what can be done with Windows 95; it
has good graphics and sound, though nothing (I assume) to rival the best
games out there.  If there's one thing it is not, however, it is a canine!

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads