Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic

Article #2934

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic Previous Next

#2934

From: fern... Fernando Pulido
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 1995 00:00

27 lines
1558 bytes

>>Tell me, why are advertisements dealing with sex so "low-class"?
>>I enjoyed sex yesterday, and I enjoy games today. What makes one more 
>>"higher-class" than the other?
>
>        One is inappropriate; one is not.  One is low-class; one is 
>high-class.  Isn't it simple enough?
>

No it's not.  My wife considers Doom and Heretic low class, but she seemed
to enjoy our little tryst last night.  Sex inappropriate?!?!?!  You 
wouldn't be here if your parents didn't have "inappropriate sex".
Simple enough.


>
>>This world has a BIG attitude problem. War is fun, but sex is filthy.
>
>        Sex IS NOT filthy.  Only satan would have people believe that.  God 
>made sex, therefore sex is good.  What's wrong is abusing anything good.  
>Since sex is good, you shouldn't abuse it.  It's simple enough.
>

While I agree that sex is not filthy, I can't help but point out how bad
your logic is.  Reminds me of a little kid's rhyme, "God made dirt, and
dirt don't hurt."  I won't go on about all the holes that your logic
leaves, I think that it is simple enough.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4097ir$ggm@dobie.loop.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl> <40399a$des_001@wilmington03.voicenet.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: fern...@loop.com (Fernando Pulido)
Subject: Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners
Date: 1995/08/09
Message-ID: <4097ir$ggm@dobie.loop.com>
X-Deja-AN: 107751178
distribution: world
references: <402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl> <40399a$des_001@wilmington03.voicenet.com>
organization: The Loop
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message