🚀 go-pugleaf

waw...@sun23.cs.wisc.edu (Joel Wawrzon) writes:

>In article <404jsd$3...@news.xs4all.nl>, Jojo  <jo...@xs4all.nl> wrote:

>I suppose you're right when you say pornography is part of "sex as we
>know it", but then again so is sado-masochism, bondage, fisting, 
>and pedophilia.  This doesn't mean that I want to see it advertised 
>between the pages of my copy of CGW.  There are plenty of other magazines
>and catalogs that cover this field pretty thoroughly.

	It's simple: if you don't like the adult ads in CGW, _don't buy CGW_,
and then you won't have to see them, will you?

>We had a good laugh over this paragraph <g>.  Let's just forget the fact that
>I never once passed judgement on anyone or even alluded to telling
>people what they should or should not do.  BTW, my second name is Christopher,

	No, you only expressed the opinion that CGW should be kept from
running the ads they want to.  Obviously, that's completely unrelated to
"telling people what they should or should not do".

>[pedantic retort as to the meaning of "low-class" snipped]

	I'll say it again.  If you feel that the content in CGW is
"low-class", no one is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to read it.

--
------Matt Bandy-------------<mba...@sponsornet.permalink.com>-------
  S p o n s o r N e t     http://sponsornet.permalink.com/sponsornet/
            "Building a Better Web Through Advertising"