Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #716759Re: [OT] nVidia vs AMD - old games
From: Rin Stowleigh
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 02:47
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 02:47
45 lines
3253 bytes
3253 bytes
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 05:23:45 +0400, "Andrew Rybenkov" <aryb...@gmail.com> wrote: >I want to upgrade my HD5770 to something significantly better. My 500Wt PSU >has only 1 6-pin connector. Right now I see only one choice - HD7850. >(It is short - 20-21cm, and uses only 20Wt more at peak) > >My major concern is compatibility with old games. With 5770 I am able to run >85% of old games, another 10-12% with older drivers on Win7-32. >(Old games are Tomb Raiders, M&M6-9, Fallouts, Thief, etc.) > >Would I be able to run 7850 with 10.x drivers? >How nVidia 6xx cards behave? (I see some nVidia customers experience significant >difficulties with old games like PoP - Sands of Time, Tomb Raiders. >I remember I had to downgrade Detonator to 2.x version to play Lands of Lore 3 >when I had FX 5700) > >What is your experience (and advice), please? IMO the real reason to go the Nvidia route has to do with an increasing awareness on the need for testing frame times / frame latency and not just frame rate. Microstutter, or general frame time inconsistency is an issue that can actually become more of a problem with faster cards rather than slower cards. Every article I've seen on the subject shows nVidia cards faring much better than AMD with regard to frame latency / consistency. Here's one article on the subject (others have posted similar articles to this NG recently): http://techreport.com/review/21516/inside-the-second-a-new-look-at-game-benchmarking While this doesn't directly answer your question about compatibility with older games, I personally have never had a problem retro gaming on NVidia cards, and that includes running some pretty old stuff (Duke Nukem 3D, Doom 3, etc). I'm pretty sure you would not want to buy a card that's inferior with newer game engines just to get better compatibility with older engines. Just my $.02
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pqm1m85rj45ov1uvg8hjkaeljgifbkia9t@4ax.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!ef9ni12051qab.0!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<op.wu5ctvxbowpbh0@obscureserver>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.224.65.6 with SMTP id g6mr2604597qai.4.1365302848399; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 19:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!ef9ni12051qab.0!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:47:28 -0500 From: Rin Stowleigh <rstow...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic Subject: Re: [OT] nVidia vs AMD - old games Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:47:11 -0400 Message-ID: <pqm1m85rj45ov1uvg8hjkaeljgifbkia9t@4ax.com> References: <op.wu5ctvxbowpbh0@obscureserver> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171 MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 45 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-aAR6KGmz1zLpzuh8yEe0FFXbSoTRE/AHnM4BowIqUvS6gozZ/EzxvShsoQSD+AbUFJHSe7IfNkSbm1O!uyhd2tZAgSYiz272WfSwdenHZV+O3hpq8HF8xbn2N6Q6DG1by0Ry9z4bUehZDjgdg649uQ== X-Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3063 X-Original-Bytes: 3002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit