Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #716559Re: Fallen Enchantress
From: Peter Huebner
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:19
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:19
53 lines
3224 bytes
3224 bytes
In article <k8difg$n6a$1@dont-email.me>, dalamb@cs.queensu.ca says... > > On 19/11/2012 6:55 AM, Peter Huebner wrote: > > Is anybody else playing this new Stardock offering? > > I've inherited it from having played their earlier Elemental: War of > Magic game, which was an interesting idea with abysmal execution. > Haven't played it yet -- been very busy with other things -- but home to > try it out over Christmas. Your positive comments remove some of my > trepidation. > > > My biggest gripe so far is that the documentation is terribly inadequate > > -the pdf manual is well nigh useless, and the 'civilopedia' is hardly > > better (because you can't search keywords and it's badly organized). > > Hmm. Is there a decent tutorial at this point? Don't think the beta had > one however many months ago I looked at it. There is a tutorial but they hardly need have bothered. It's only brief and only explains the very basic elements of how to play. > > It used to be that stacks of multiple champions ruled. Have they > restricted it to one champion per stack now? > There is no limitation. I ended up, in the one game I won, with a stack of 7 champions. Mostly that was because I was too busy building up my cities rather than creating troups. I will focus more on building troups in some future game(s). > > Overall I'd say this is one of the better strategy game releases I have > > seen for a good long time - considering that I'm a tbs & 4x fan. > > I'll try it out again, but probably not until too late to provide > feedback to your post. > > Are the forums still dominated by haters? I've spent about 1/2 an hour on the forums last night, there's a very nice stickied noob guide that I looked into; it has a lot more info in it than what's been offered up by Stardock. I looked through a few threads but didn't see any detractors, never mind haters. I need to spend a lot more time with this before I decide if it's a keeper or not. It certainly seems to be a slow moving game. In an easy mode large map with fast tech advancement I spent 13-14 hours (99 in- game years) before victory. Was nowhere near the end of the tech tree. Comparable maybe to Civ IV or V on a huge map? -P.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.2b154d8d8607d0729896cf@news.individual.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news.nosignal.org!cs.uu.nl!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPG.2b14e545a67b40bd9896ce@news.individual.net> <k8difg$n6a$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news.nosignal.org!cs.uu.nl!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Peter Huebner <no.one@this.address> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic Subject: Re: Fallen Enchantress Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:19:59 +1300 Lines: 53 Message-ID: <MPG.2b154d8d8607d0729896cf@news.individual.net> References: <MPG.2b14e545a67b40bd9896ce@news.individual.net> <k8difg$n6a$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net hSVJxgPVm768obBKKY9hkw5RiTZobWHeT3Jh2P8BoZhu21PH8OUtV+RIqJLmB0jA5C Cancel-Lock: sha1:1JNz3+63FskOBXoAE8M76qBJnhM= User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 Bytes: 3203 X-Original-Bytes: 3129 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit