🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #716559

Re: Fallen Enchantress

#716559
From: Peter Huebner
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:19
53 lines
3224 bytes
In article <k8difg$n6a$1@dont-email.me>, dalamb@cs.queensu.ca says...
> 
> On 19/11/2012 6:55 AM, Peter Huebner wrote:
> > Is anybody else playing this new Stardock offering?
> 
> I've inherited it from having played their earlier Elemental: War of 
> Magic game, which was an interesting idea with abysmal execution. 
> Haven't played it yet -- been very busy with other things -- but home to 
> try it out over Christmas. Your positive comments remove some of my 
> trepidation.
> 
> > My biggest gripe so far is that the documentation is terribly inadequate
> > -the pdf manual is well nigh useless, and the 'civilopedia' is hardly
> > better (because you can't search keywords and it's badly organized).
> 
> Hmm. Is there a decent tutorial at this point? Don't think the beta had 
> one however many months ago I looked at it.

There is a tutorial but they hardly need have bothered. It's only brief 
and only explains the very basic elements of how to play.


> 
> It used to be that stacks of multiple champions ruled. Have they 
> restricted it to one champion per stack now?
> 

There is no limitation. I ended up, in the one game I won, with a stack 
of 7 champions. Mostly that was because I was too busy building up my 
cities rather than creating troups. I will focus more on building troups 
in some future game(s).

> > Overall I'd say this is one of the better strategy game releases I 
have
> > seen for a good long time - considering that I'm a tbs & 4x fan.
> 
> I'll try it out again, but probably not until too late to provide 
> feedback to your post.
> 
> Are the forums still dominated by haters?

I've spent about 1/2 an hour on the forums last night, there's a very 
nice stickied noob guide that I looked into; it has a lot more info in 
it than what's been offered up by Stardock. I looked through a few 
threads but didn't see any detractors, never mind haters.

I need to spend a lot more time with this before I decide if it's a 
keeper or not. It certainly seems to be a slow moving game. In an easy 
mode large map with fast tech advancement I spent 13-14 hours (99 in-
game years) before victory. Was nowhere near the end of the tech tree. 
Comparable maybe to Civ IV or V on a huge map? 

-P.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <MPG.2b154d8d8607d0729896cf@news.individual.net>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news.nosignal.org!cs.uu.nl!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <MPG.2b14e545a67b40bd9896ce@news.individual.net> <k8difg$n6a$1@dont-email.me>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news.nosignal.org!cs.uu.nl!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Peter Huebner <no.one@this.address>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Subject: Re: Fallen Enchantress
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:19:59 +1300
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <MPG.2b154d8d8607d0729896cf@news.individual.net>
References: <MPG.2b14e545a67b40bd9896ce@news.individual.net> <k8difg$n6a$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net hSVJxgPVm768obBKKY9hkw5RiTZobWHeT3Jh2P8BoZhu21PH8OUtV+RIqJLmB0jA5C
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1JNz3+63FskOBXoAE8M76qBJnhM=
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Bytes: 3203
X-Original-Bytes: 3129
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit