🚀 go-pugleaf

MK <none nowhere.com> wrote: 

> Been largely busy with work and life, pulled the new headers in
> the group to find 265 new posts only. 
> 
> This begs a question - is it just that strategic / turn based is 
> largely dead, or is it the entire Usenet community. 
> 
> Any thoughts what the current equivalent for the csipg.strategic
> would be with a decent signal/noise ratio? 
> 
> I kinda dislike the thought of continuing to pay Usenet (the
> service) 

Then don't.

Bye.

-- 











> for the dubious privilege 
> 
> == antiquated rat ==
> 
> 
no archive
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!
feeder.eternal-september.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-
nord.net!usenet-fr.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-
2.proxad.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!
69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-
media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!not-for-mail
> From: MK <none nowhere.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
> Subject: Away for a bit over a year from csipg.strategic and I see 
only 265 posts - is the group dead or the usenet dead?
> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:54:52 -0400
> Organization: UseNetServer - www.usenetserver.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse usenetserver.com
> Message-ID: <28g3o7p5kshnr2akrgk68hjjttpirag01k 4ax.com>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.0/32.763
> X-No-Archive: yes
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 13
> X-Received-Bytes: 1047
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org 
comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic:2374
>