🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #716015

Re: Stacraft 2. What do you think?

#716015
From: Doug Jacobs
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:20
30 lines
2718 bytes
Lance Corporal Hammer Schultz <starfist@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Okay, so the menu graphics had no cap on the framerate, and some
> people's cards overheated and were destroyed.
> 
> This is most definitely *not* the fault of Blizzard.  If a card can
> run so hot as to destroy itself, that is either due to bad card
> design/poor cooling, or overclocking.
> 
> The people demanding that Blizzard replace their hardware are just
> whiners.

I'm not so sure.

Name one other piece of software that has this same problem.

...

Ok, so apparently Blizzard did something different that all those other 
software authors didn't do that caused this problem.  Otherwise, why 
hasn't this been a problem with other games?  Heck Starcraft2 isn't even 
one of those "system crushers" like Crysis was when it first relased, and 
we still didn't have reports of peoples video cards breaking down.

Oh I'm not saying the hardware and driver folks don't deserve a large 
part of the blame here.  Gracefully handling bad, possibly catastrophic 
input is their job, and they failed miserably.  At the same time, I find 
it hard not to include Blizzard here due to this not having occured before.

-- 
It's not broken.  It's...advanced.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <_KmdnbpcktfGpvnRnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@posted.rawbandwidth>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.rawbandwidth!news.posted.rawbandwidth.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <147a77aa-9df4-4cbc-a782-7bcfb1780b87@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <soGdnSiHuskYSMvRnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <13v41qk1kdf5t$.dlg@starfist.thorsfinni>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.rawbandwidth!news.posted.rawbandwidth.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:20:11 -0500
From: Doug Jacobs <djacobs@rawbw.com>
Subject: Re: Stacraft 2. What do you think?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
References: <147a77aa-9df4-4cbc-a782-7bcfb1780b87@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <soGdnSiHuskYSMvRnZ2dnUVZ_vSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <13v41qk1kdf5t$.dlg@starfist.thorsfinni>
Organization: Raw Bandwidth Communications' customer
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/7.1-PRERELEASE (amd64))
Message-ID: <_KmdnbpcktfGpvnRnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@posted.rawbandwidth>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:20:11 -0500
Lines: 30
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.144.192.45
X-Trace: sv3-J2RMEJvJ+4cIil8Ls2DVszvMHHa79pNGatKSM27QGT1fsb5Zy5HdCA+NQM4acVoIV5iyyQDLm9HjH/7!Ycj8JnWZeMwxEUrqDAm3j45a9SN2UHZYgFUuxwgTItiCQZBo/r/2CFpjX8CRADNlJJCP54mUNgph!2IPDjOUdon3RKji602d+07TIjQ==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2672
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit