Re: any rts better than starcraft?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic

Article #664006

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic Previous Next

#664006

From: Iguana
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 19:31

9 lines
1593 bytes

On 14.7.2012. 1:37, willard.hagen@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 16, 2003 6:59:13 PM UTC-6, Spork wrote:
>> is starcraft still the best rts game out there? i tried warcraft 3 and it
>> was alright but it didnt have the same feeling as starcraft. i havent played
>> a good rts in a year or so i was just wondering whats out there.
>
> If you haven't tried Dark Reign, you don't know what real RTS is. :)

+1! :)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <jtshe1$qvf$1@ls237.t-com.hr>

Path:

mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.snarked.org!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!newsfeed.t-com.hr!news1.t-com.hr!.POSTED!not-for-mail

References: <z9Hjb.295610$mp.233617@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> <9d98420d-e722-4ca6-94ea-86b2f2b690d3@googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.snarked.org!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!newsfeed.t-com.hr!news1.t-com.hr!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Iguana <Iguana^MGT@hi.htnet.hr>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Subject: Re: any rts better than starcraft?
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:31:06 +0200
Organization: T-HT
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <jtshe1$qvf$1@ls237.t-com.hr>
References: <z9Hjb.295610$mp.233617@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> <9d98420d-e722-4ca6-94ea-86b2f2b690d3@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-143-187-134.adsl.net.t-com.hr
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: ls237.t-com.hr 1342294273 27631 93.143.187.134 (14 Jul 2012 19:31:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-com.hr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 19:31:13 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
In-Reply-To: <9d98420d-e722-4ca6-94ea-86b2f2b690d3@googlegroups.com>
Bytes: 1647
X-Original-Bytes: 1573
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message