Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #581269Re: Imperialism II - Still holds up
From: jn... Logiman
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:57
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:57
24 lines
2095 bytes
2095 bytes
"Bob Perez" <b...@planetperez.com> wrote in message news:<a52dem$465jl$1...@ID-109358.news.dfncis.de>... > I've been playing Imperialism II again lately. After tiring of the > micromanagement, end-game stall and lack of tactical control offered by the > Civ type games, and the simplistic (albeit fun) model used by many of the > popular TB tactical titles (HOMM, AOW, etc), I found that I really > appreciate the depth, easy management and excellent production values > offered by this under-appreciated gem. What a great game, timeless. Wow. I didn't know so many people loved this game as much I do. I still think it's the best turn-based, wargame-like strategy game around (I throw in that "wargame-like" because it's hard for me to put Imp II in the same category with X-COM, which I think is the finest game of *it's* kind around). At the risk of getting flamed, last time I looked Imp II was available for free download on Underdogs. The copy there works too. I know, since I got it to replace the CD I lost (I swear. The only game I ever lost, and one of my all time favorites...) I'll also second the good word somebody put in for the strategy guide. It's one of only a bare handful that actually contains useful information, and it contains a lot. I still read it from time to time to see if I can pick up any hints I might have missed the first hundred times through.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bc1269ba.0202260157.38874be6@posting.google.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a52dem$465jl$1@ID-109358.news.dfncis.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: jn...@pacbell.net (Logiman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic Subject: Re: Imperialism II - Still holds up Date: 26 Feb 2002 01:57:20 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 24 Message-ID: <bc1269ba.0202260157.38874be6@posting.google.com> References: <a52dem$465jl$1@ID-109358.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.199.200.162 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1014717441 23150 127.0.0.1 (26 Feb 2002 09:57:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Feb 2002 09:57:21 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit