🚀 go-pugleaf

jh...@chabot.ced.berkeley.edu  writes:
> Incredibly enough, some of you are expending so much of your
> energy and time in something that is really insignificant.
> I apologize to all CSIPGS folks for even bothering to pursue 
> this thread, and I hope it's the last one.  
> Let's think about this.  The reason that some of you people
> are in such a huff about the ads--could it be that some of
> you are actually like it and are ashamed of it?  Well, if
> that's the case, don't fret.  Doesn't mean you're a pervert
> or a deviant.  It just means that you're a healthy, normal adult
> (or adolescent, whatever.)  The problem with this country
> is the straight-laced puritanical type that have instilled
> us in our minds since the day of Mayflower that our body
> is somehow "dirty."  What?! how twisted can you get?  
> So, the ads are somewhat provocative.  They are (shudder)
> sexy.  So what?  What's a 13 year old reading the magazine
> going to do?  I guess we have to worry that his mind is
> now polluted and worry about him being a rapist.  
> 
> I'll have you know, in places like Japan and Germany where
> nudity in publication is an accepted thing, yet you don't
> see all the youths there all messed up, do you?  If anything
> the unhealthy repression of the natural is what's messing up
> the youths of America.  So all the people who don't like the ads,
> lighten up, be honest with yourself, and don't be so damn 
> tight-assed all the time.
> 

	No, how 'bout I be honest with you. You statement to my
mind is just a bunch of jumbled, confused foolishnish. You
"select" the potential age of a young reader as "13". Gee,
that's real ass-tute of you. The issue being debated is not the
relative age of 13, but the relative age of 7 or 8. So get a
clue mr. know-it-all. My niece and nephew are currently
visiting and they've been looking at my CGW mags for days now;
ages: 8 and 10. Obviously I allow them to read the mag, but I
would prefer that the sex-ads not be present, as they are
mostly gratuitous B.S. in relation to computer gaming. 

	Oh, by the way, I'd rather be a tight-ass than a
dumb-ass. 

	Unimpressed by your babble, 
		Patrick K.