🚀 go-pugleaf

john....@hq.com (John Tracey) writes:


>Frankly, I don't know of anyone -- even those who disagree with us on
>this issue -- who think you've fared well in this thread.
>Anyone, that is, except you.

How disappointing it must be for you to hear that I actually got supporting
email. I'm not the only one who doesn't care about the feelings of 
narrow-minded people.

>P.S. Perhaps if you publish your Top 40/Top 100 lists only every =third=
>week or so, you'd have time to study rhetoric?

With such unimaginative and irrational arguments as you have been giving, 
I really don't need to.  Or better, with such a lack of any arguments at 
all (in your last few posts).

I am so thrilled to have found what must be the least talented writer of 
this newsgroup. There were at least four arguments of mine (ABOUT THE 
REAL DEBATE) that were still holding very strong. The only thing you did 
since then is attacking me on my grammar/spelling, my adulthood (I'm 26) 
and my debating skills.  You remind me of Bush in the latest presidential 
campaign. Just throw mud to hide the fact that you've actually got 
nothing to say. The real debate has died with ME as the last contributor.

You are a looser of gigantic proportions. Even someone from 'your side' of 
this flamewar has laughed you in the face for it. You are noise in the 
real debate. You wouldn't even know how to respond to a good argument if you 
had the answer in a script.

Do you understand why I waste so much time on your non-existant debating 
skills? Because they make mine look superior so easy. I don't even 
consider myself as being good at flamewars. But you're the easiest target 
I have ever encountered. And I've loved every moment of it.

Come back in two years or so...

Jurgen.