Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #2965Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners
From: luth... Robert v Luthardt jr
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 1995 00:00
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 1995 00:00
65 lines
2954 bytes
2954 bytes
In article <4067cv$6...@news.xs4all.nl>, Jojo <jo...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >john....@hq.com (John Tracey) writes: > >>You aren't really for a plurality of opinions, Jojo, no >>matter how enlightened you imagine your sexual ethos. With you it's: I'm >>right, disagree and you're a moron. > >>Just like a child's view of life. > >I have been trying to make two points here. You've obviously failed to see >what I mean: > >1) I don't think sex ads are bad for children. There are more important > things to worry about. Why don't these same people complain about the > violent pictures in CGW? It's illogical to complain about sex and not > about the violence. At what age will you allow your children to watch porn films? >2) I don't want people to decide on what I should read. People who try to > influence CGW (and many times society as a whole) are indirectly telling > me what not to read. > >Point 1) is something I like to discuss about, although sometimes perhaps >a bit too enthusiasticly. But I grant anyone his own opinion. > >Point 2) is something for which I don't accept other opinion. I don't >want people to tell me how to live, what to read and what to say. I can >decide for myself. So, leave the sex ads in the mag, 'cause I might want >to have a look at them. Then buy a Hustler! > >And yes, I still think that many people are morons. And people can call >me names too, I don't care. If I call someone a moron, it doesn't add to >my arguments, but it also doesn't make my arguments invalid (as you would >like to wish). It's just something I have to say, as a result of many >years of frustration. > >My arguments still stand. Come up with some interesting contra-arguments, >or go away. I thought you said that if CGW disagreed with you, you would shut up? > >Jurgen. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert v Luthardt jr*luth...@clark.net*http://www.clark.net/pub/luthardt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!" -Adolf Hitler,passing of the German Weapons Act, 1935. -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<40hr6b$gis@clarknet.clark.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4036pr$853@news.xs4all.nl> <402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl> <4032mh$5ca@ixnews4.ix. <95080711001511942@hq.com> <4067cv$67v@news.xs4all.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: luth...@clark.net (Robert v Luthardt jr) Subject: Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners Date: 1995/08/12 Message-ID: <40hr6b$gis@clarknet.clark.net> X-Deja-AN: 107975491 references: <4036pr$853@news.xs4all.nl> <402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl> <4032mh$5ca@ixnews4.ix. <95080711001511942@hq.com> <4067cv$67v@news.xs4all.nl> organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit