🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #2965

Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners

#2965
From: luth... Robert v Luthardt jr
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 1995 00:00
65 lines
2954 bytes
In article <4067cv$6...@news.xs4all.nl>, Jojo <jo...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>john....@hq.com (John Tracey) writes:
>
>>You aren't really for a plurality of opinions, Jojo, no
>>matter how enlightened you imagine your sexual ethos. With you it's: I'm
>>right, disagree and you're a moron.
>
>>Just like a child's view of life.
>
>I have been trying to make two points here. You've obviously failed to see
>what I mean:
>
>1) I don't think sex ads are bad for children. There are more important
>   things to worry about. Why don't these same people complain about the
>   violent pictures in CGW? It's illogical to complain about sex and not
>   about the violence.

At what age will you allow your children to watch porn films?



>2) I don't want people to decide on what I should read. People who try to
>   influence CGW (and many times society as a whole) are indirectly telling
>   me what not to read.
>
>Point 1) is something I like to discuss about, although sometimes perhaps 
>a bit too enthusiasticly. But I grant anyone his own opinion.
>
>Point 2) is something for which I don't accept other opinion. I don't 
>want people to tell me how to live, what to read and what to say. I can 
>decide for myself. So, leave the sex ads in the mag, 'cause I might want 
>to have a look at them.

Then buy a Hustler!



>
>And yes, I still think that many people are morons. And people can call 
>me names too, I don't care. If I call someone a moron, it doesn't add to 
>my arguments, but it also doesn't make my arguments invalid (as you would 
>like to wish). It's just something I have to say, as a result of many 
>years of frustration.
>
>My arguments still stand. Come up with some interesting contra-arguments, 
>or go away.


I thought you said that if CGW disagreed with you, you would shut up?



>
>Jurgen.
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert v Luthardt jr*luth...@clark.net*http://www.clark.net/pub/luthardt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation
has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more
efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"
-Adolf Hitler,passing of the German Weapons Act, 1935.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <40hr6b$gis@clarknet.clark.net>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4036pr$853@news.xs4all.nl> <402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl> <4032mh$5ca@ixnews4.ix. <95080711001511942@hq.com> <4067cv$67v@news.xs4all.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: luth...@clark.net (Robert v Luthardt jr)
Subject: Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners
Date: 1995/08/12
Message-ID: <40hr6b$gis@clarknet.clark.net>
X-Deja-AN: 107975491
references: <4036pr$853@news.xs4all.nl> <402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl> <4032mh$5ca@ixnews4.ix. <95080711001511942@hq.com> <4067cv$67v@news.xs4all.nl>
organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc.
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit