🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <406u8o$8...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, RDClark <rdc...@aol.com> wrote:
)>2) I don't want people to decide on what I should read. People who try to
)>   influence CGW (and many times society as a whole) are indirectly
)telling
)>   me what not to read.
)
)This argument belongs in the compost pile.
)
)At the very most, they are trying to influence where you read it. And they
)have just as much a right to tell CGW "I don't want to see this stuff in
)your magazine" as you do to say "I love it; gimme more!"
)
)>Point 2) is something for which I don't accept other opinion. I don't 
)>want people to tell me how to live, what to read and what to say. I can 
)>decide for myself. So, leave the sex ads in the mag, 'cause I might want 
)>to have a look at them.
)
)And what Jojo wants determines what everybody else should do. Sorry, son,
)that's not an argument. It's a baby whining, and for essentially the same
)reason.

Jojo is doing the same thing you are - letting his opinion be known
on matters of principle, and expressing very strong opinions.

It's interesting that when he does this, he's "whining", and when you
do this, it's just "free speech".