Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #2940Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners
From: cha... Charles Smith
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 00:00
54 lines
3508 bytes
3508 bytes
Jojo (jo...@xs4all.nl) wrote:
: bad...@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Jonathan Badger) writes:
: >But it just is *so* low-class. Why not have these ads in magazines like
: >"Playboy" where the readers WANT this sort of thing? You don't see these
: >ads in "Scientific American" do you?
: Tell me, why are advertisements dealing with sex so "low-class"?
: I enjoyed sex yesterday, and I enjoy games today. What makes one more
: "higher-class" than the other?
: If you don't want to see sex ads in a magazine, then just turn the page.
: Is that so hard? Just read the things you want to read and don't read the
: other stuff. Whooooaah, now that's a biiiig problem for some of you,
: isn't it? <include sarcasm here> People who think sex ads are offensive
: have enjoyed an unhealthy education and need treatment. They secretly
: enjoy the ads, they feel ashamed and they want to get rid of them to
: purify themselves. Yuk! The sex ads mean nothing to me, so I just turn
: the pages. Yes, I actually found out that you *don't* need to read an
: *entire* magazine from cover to cover. You *are* allowed to skip a few pages!
: And to those people who complain about their kids reading CGW:
: 1) The magazine is not written for 10 year olds. I have yet to find the
: first 10 year old to praise the intelligent reviews of this magazine.
: 2) If you want to hide the fact that sex exists in this world, while at
: the same you time you happily want your kid to read about wargames,
: then *you* are the one with a big education problem, and your kid will
: not be grateful to you in the end.
: This world has a BIG attitude problem. War is fun, but sex is filthy.
: The sex ads help CGW to raise money. They use this money to make a good
: magazine. Take it or leave it.
: Bunch of whiners.
: Jurgen.
--
Well, yes -- we are whiners. But we are whiners who think that it is
truly a shame that sex, a thing of beauty, of human caring, should be
reduced to being a mere commodity. Its truly sad that an activity that
should represent the fullment of humanities potential to care and love
other humans ends up as a "game," advertised with all the crassness of a
Coca-cola commercial. Good grief folks -- are you all that jaded?
۲����� �������
۲� ���
۲� ������� This message was sent by:
۲� ��� Charlie Smith in Palm Beach, Florida
۲����� ������� Internet address:
Cha...@PBFreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us
"Iowa smart 'n Florida savvy..."
����������������������������������������������������������������������������
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<45ieg0$jpm@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: cha...@pbfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us (Charles Smith) Subject: Re: About the CGW sex ads whiners Date: 1995/10/12 Message-ID: <45ieg0$jpm@bcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us> X-Deja-AN: 117437547 references: <402b12$lur@news.xs4all.nl> followup-to: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc organization: SEFLIN Free-Net - Palm Beach newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.misc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit