🚀 go-pugleaf

Tempest (cw...@wi.leidenuniv.nl) wrote:
> >If these adult CD ads have their place in CGW, how come we do not see ANY
> >reviews of adult CD's in this magazine?
> >
> >Isn't this a typical case of double standards?
> >
> Uhmm...should a computer magazine really review adult CDs on their 
> 'titillation' value? No...I don't think so, but as adult CDs are intended for 
> ehh computer users...I think they belong in a computer magazine. Sex phone 
> lines or car ads don't belong in a computer mag. Adult CDs do. Now as long as 
> they don't show any, eh..'crucial' parts...what's wrong with those ads? 

That's the flaw in your logic though... You, on one hand, say that
these ads belong in a computer magazine because they are aimed at
computer users, but then on the other hand you do not feel that it is
right to review these "pieces of entertainment"... So if they are
unworthy of being reviewed because this may outrage some of the
readership, why not follow it up with the assumption that these games
therefore must not appeal to the readership... Because in essence what
you are saying is, is that the presence of these ads does not alienate
a majority of the readership, a review of their content however may
just very well... So doesn't that make these "games" unworthy to be at
all in the magazine???



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean Kaye
2nd Year Arts
Carleton University

Email address: sk...@chat.carleton.ca
----------------------------------------------------------------------