🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <95080611...@hq.com>, John Tracey <john....@hq.com> wrote:
>
>J-> This world has a BIG attitude problem. War is fun, but sex is filthy.
>
>Yes, I know, there are those of us too simple to understand how healthy
>it is to fill young heads with carnal knowledge as early as possible.
>
>Oh, and this notion of sex-as-beautiful -- you're so right! Those porn
>movies are so beautiful, so sexually healthy -- those women who seek
>penetration after a six-minute introduction, God knows that's
>liberating. No, they don't kiss, but that's okay -- it just gets in the
>way, and increases the wait for the "climax" -- all over her back. The
>sexual epiphany in every healty porn CD-ROM.
>
>You're right. Our attitudes about sex are so antiquated. "A Pussy Called
>Wanda" has got it all over us. Thanks for showing us the way.
>

Hah!  Now that's a retort that I only wish I had come up with.  I think
that brilliant little piece of prose pretty much clears up any ambiguity
on the differences between sex and pornography.  Jojo is Dutch, so we can
understand and forgive his confusion <G>.

As for censorship:  no one is suggesting that anything be censored.  It's
simply a matter of the publishers taking responsibility for their content.
The porno ads are pretty low-class and out of place in a magazine with a
reputation like CGW.  The publishers should have more taste and common sense
than this.  I suppose it's up to us and the companies that advertise in CGW
(like C Systems) to let them know that we dissaprove.  If they don't get the
point, then they don't get the money.  Simple.  No big brother anywhere.

Joel
------------------------------------------
Joel Wawrzon
Univ. of Wisc. Dept. of Computer Science
waw...@cs.wisc.edu
------------------------------------------