🚀 go-pugleaf

In <3n3bqi$2...@taco.cc.ncsu.edu>, jlwo...@unity.ncsu.edu (Jeffrey Lee Woodall) writes:
>
>John Michael Martz (jma...@gibbs.oit.unc.edu) wrote:
>: Here we have two people with reading comprehension deficits of one kind or
>: another.  They obviously cannot tell when somebody is asking a genuine
>: question, as I was doing.  Instead of trying to directly answer my
>: question about Win95 capabilities with a detailed explanation that would
>
>I sent you E-mail fully describing how DOS sessions work in Win95.  I was 
>hardly rude about it, either.  Your initial posts seemed to be presenting 
>untruths as fact.  When you realized you were wrong, you changed your 
>min-informative posts to "questions".  Just clearing up things a bit.
>
>Jeff

This coming from someone who admitted yesterday that he flew off the
handle.

If you like, I'll repost his original message.  He did ask a simple question.
The one statement he made was "As I understand it, Windows 95 cannot
run multiple configurations in concurrently running DOS sessions" or something
to that effect.  There STILL has not been anyone that's given any new
information regarding this (it's possible this has been updated in the
latest version of Win95, but the information I have also says that Win95
runs every concurrently running DOS program in a single VM).  You started
to quote my last message on this matter a couple of posts ago, but then
you didn't actually write anything after the quote.  So us OS/2 users are
still in the dark about this; please enlighten us.

//  Jeff Williams
//  NYU UGFTV/Cinema Studies
//  jmw...@is2.nyu.edu