Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic
Article #2103Re: Win95: Been there, done that.
From: wver... Wim Verveen
Date: Mon, 29 May 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 29 May 1995 00:00
27 lines
1613 bytes
1613 bytes
In article <27288.e...@gold.tc.umn.edu>,
"eber...@gold.tc.umn.edu" <eber...@gold.tc.umn.edu> wrote:
>
> >I know this article doesn't belong here, but then again this entire
> >thread doesn't really belong here ... but can somebody please tell me
> >straight out ... is Win95 really a true 32-bit OS???
>
> It depends upon what YOU'RE running. Run nothing but 32-bit apps (that
> don't exist yet)
Sigh, the do exist. NT aplications wich don't use NT security functions
run also on win95.
> and it behaves much like OS/2, as far as multi-tasking
> goes. Throw ONE 8 or 16-bit monkey-wrench in the works, and you're back to
> good ole' Windoze again, hourglass and all.
But at least they run.
> Also, Win95 is nowhere near as stable as OS/2. T
This is partly true. It is not as stable. With the current design it never will
be. But it is quite stable.
Wim Verveen (wver...@xs4all.nl) | Generals are in the nice white tent
| on the hill, sipping sancerre
| directing the battle; They are
| men of honour Rimmer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<fZmyvIxWcnNW083yn@xs4all.nl>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<27288.eber0021@gold.tc.umn.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: wver...@xs4all.nl (Wim Verveen) Subject: Re: Win95: Been there, done that. Date: 1995/05/29 Message-ID: <fZmyvIxWcnNW083yn@xs4all.nl> X-Deja-AN: 103484853 references: <27288.eber0021@gold.tc.umn.edu> organization: XS4ALL, the Netherlands x-posted-by: wver...@xs1.xs4all.nl newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit