🚀 go-pugleaf

In <matuseDA...@netcom.com> mat...@netcom.com (Matuse) writes: 
>
>In article <3sl0sj$t...@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU>
jord...@benji.Colorado.EDU (JORDAN  SPENSER AARON) writes:
>>>I agree, that OS2/WARP can kick the shit out of Win95.  I tell you
>>>this, there is a still a use for Win95, since OS2/WARP can only run
95% 
>>>of Windows programs. You will still need windows to run the other 5%
>>>and you can use the disks to wipe the shit off your asshole when you
>>>get done taking a shit.  Well unless you have the CD-ROM version,
then
>>>you have a good frizbee to though around the yard.
>>
>>Windows 95 kicks the shit out of OS/2.  And I prefer to wipe my ass
with 
>>OS/2 installation disks.
>


I have used OS/2 WARP in my computer class for a month and a-half.  And
it was a lot easer to use.  All most the same as Windows, but thing I
like the most of OS/2 was that it has true multitasking and it will not
lock up your system as much as Windows does.  

>Since you have admitted to never having SEEN os/2, please back up this

>claim that win is better.
>

You want me to back up my claim!!!  

Let all face it!  Win95 IS NOT out yet so who is the judge to say it is
better then OS/2 WARP.  Everyone is getting there claim from Magazines
not by using it.  I have heard of a Beta virsion of WIN95, but is it
the true Win95 Program!!!!  NO IT ISN'T!!!  So lets do the world a
favor and DROP THE ARUMENT that OS/2 is better the Win95 or the other
way around!!  When it comes out and you have tried it, not like that
lyer that says he did and didn't, then you can tell the world how
FUCKUP each one is compard to each other.

BIG BEAR