🚀 go-pugleaf

an29...@anon.penet.fi writes:


>In article <3st4m9$4...@lynx.unm.edu> you wrote:
>: l...@ld.nacamar.de wrote:
>: [blah]
>: just kill the string 'win'95' and you'll be set.
>: much as I have 'macint' and 'pentium'


>I tried this. Didn't help nuch cause those
>badly educated OS flamers change their subjects 
>every other day.

Well, some of us consider it appropriate to change subject lines to
reflect the CONTENT of the message. This is a *service*. Nothing is
worse than a misleading subject line. (Like this subject for example
-- this message has nothing to do with OS/2 or Win 95)

And secondly, while some of the people involved, such as the juvenile
"Big Bear" ARE flamers, using typical flamer's tactics such as foul
language and insults, as a whole it would be hard to describe this
debate as a "flame war" in any true sense.

Frankly I can't understand why anyone would have a problem with this
thread -- if you don't want to read it, don't. There are many threads on
this group that I don't read, yet I don't complain about them -- what's
*your* problem?