🚀 go-pugleaf

In <jhamilt.798228637@bgsuvax>, jha...@bgsuvax.bgsu.edu (Tarquelne) writes:
>	Right now OS/2 seems to be the best choice.  Why?  Well, I haven't 
>learned much about Win95 or OS/2 from the thread, but I have recieved a definite
>impression of their users from the messages in this thread.
>	The OS/2 users seemed to be reasonable, intelligent people attempting to have a discussion.
>	Most of the Win95 users (not all, but most) seemed immature and ill
>informed.
>	Personally, I'm much more inclined to trust the opinions of the OS/2 
>users rather than the Win95 users.  As far as "character" references go, OS/2
>is way ahead.  
>	"Good job!" OS/2 people!
>	And, if there are any Win95 users worth hearing from, please post!  I
>want to hear both sides of the story.  Not the OS/2 side and some ranting.

	You should check out comp.os.os2.advocacy (and its Win counterpart),
where most of the really rabid OS/2 users hang out.  While the games groups
seem to have been hit with mostly clueless Win95 people, on Usenet as a
whole the percentages are pretty even.  Of course, both sides see the other
as a bunch of raving lunatics.
	All you have to do is ignore any post with the words "roolz", "sucks",
"losers" or "sloooooooooow" and you may actually find some useful info.  And,
of course, nothing beats six months of hands on experience.
	I myself much prefer debating with NT users.  We still disagree on a
lot of things, but its mostly because we have different needs.  Not so much 
insult-flinging and pettiness.
	I see this thread has yet to be posted to alt.fan.q and alt.2600.

Derek
drk...@ocf.berkeley.edu