🚀 go-pugleaf

>>require Win95 at least 6 weeks prior to Aug. 24 if they have any hope of
>>making it available by then.  This deadline would appear to have been missed
>>but that's another story.  So, Microsoft has several weeks following the
>>code lock on Win95 in which to code bug fixes to be included in PP.  
>Naturally,
>>these bug fixes will not be found in the beta versions os PP which fall prior
>>to the code lock on Win95 because if the code were not locked, then they 
>might
>>as well put the fixes right in the OS!
>>
>>There, 'nuff said. 
>
>No Rob, not 'nuff said. You are clueless on what Plus! is. Plus is not a bug 
>fix for Windows 95. This does not qualify as FUD, it is down right not true. 
>Is this what Team OS/2 has been teaching  you, to not tell the truth? To make 
>things up that sound bad against Windows 95? You are yet another Team OS/2 
>member out spreading untruths.

Oh, dont even bother talking to a team OS/2 member.  Save your breath for 
your cheers on August 24th.

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________________
                    __________    No matter where you go,
                   /  ______  \       there you are.
                  |  |      |  |