🚀 go-pugleaf

Other features INClude crashing. Not being able to load saved games.
And many other problems.


Most result in your PC exploding in flames.

Iam just getting all this from the EgoSoft Forums. Those german guys
realy know how to write a crappy game and relaease crappy patches to
try to fix everything. But never do :(}


On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:29:20 +0800, "Ceowulf" <ceo@NOSPAMii.ATALLnet>
wrote:

>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>-= *X3: REUNION - THE 1.4 UPDATE* =-
>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>The 1.4 update for X³ provides some new game features as well as
>improving on those added in 1.3 and fixing a variety of problems
>experienced by some players in different parts of the game. For those
>who have been playing the 1.3.1 and 1.3.2 BETA versions, the even
>better news is that savegames from these versions are compatible with
>1.4.
>
>New features in 1.4:
> * Tug Laser allows M6/TL class ships to move stations using a tractor
>beam
> * New commands for automated mobile mining are available through the
>Special Command Software
> * New option to have ships contact you once they have completed their
>current command
>
>Other improvements in 1.4:
>
> * If a hired TL freighter is destroyed an entry in your logbook will
>be created
> * New military ships have better scanners
> * M6 class ships have better energy generators
> * Improved performance in sectors with large asteroid counts (Ore
>Belt, Savage Spur)
> * Additional graphics options to help improve performance on
>lower-end graphics cards
>
>The 1.4 update will replace the previous 1.3 update and will of course
>include all of its changes.
>

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:35:33 +1100, Kylie Saunders <Kylie Saunders.com.au>
wrote:

>
>
>
>
>Other features INClude crashing. Not being able to load saved games.
>And many other problems.
>
>
>Most result in your PC exploding in flames.
>
>Iam just getting all this from the EgoSoft Forums. Those german guys
>realy know how to write a crappy game and relaease crappy patches to
>try to fix everything. But never do :(}

I patched to 1.4 and found the game a lot smoother. Haven't seen any great
additions to the game that will make the game more fun for me unfortunately.

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:22:21 GMT, Memnoch
<memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:

>
>I patched to 1.4 and found the game a lot smoother. Haven't seen any great
>additions to the game that will make the game more fun for me unfortunately.


So is X3 basically the same as X2?...'cept for fancy graphics and
whatnots?

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:12:44 GMT, Shingen <shingen@aolsuks.sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:22:21 GMT, Memnoch
><memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>I patched to 1.4 and found the game a lot smoother. Haven't seen any great
>>additions to the game that will make the game more fun for me unfortunately.
>
>
>So is X3 basically the same as X2?...'cept for fancy graphics and
>whatnots?

Some people would say yes. I never got into X2 very far as I had just come off
playing X-Tension or X 1.5 as it should have been known. It was so similar I
just couldn't be arsed to play it after a week. This game is more of the same
it just looks a hell of a lot better. It is fun but I worry that Egosoft are
doing games development Smart style, selling the same product over and over
again. All of their games have the same basic premise really. Space is broken
up into little grids with gates at the four cardinal points (very roughly).
Outside of this area there is usually nothing going on.  You fly you ship
across this chessboard selling and fighting. If I described the game that way
to someone I honestly believe they wouldn't be able to tell which of their
four games I was referring to. The thing that makes it apart from the
graphics, which are superb, are the fan made scripts especially the
artificical life ones.

X3 is the same X2 evn the Bordem remains. Tedium and fucktardiness.
The Germans lost the WAR why are they aloud to do this to us with this
game NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

I can't belive thi sgam eis a full priced game. Its a backyard-garage
game. Sur eit looks good but its SO FRACING boring. Ist supposed to be
space trading game. But its Go SO BORING missions its unbleivable. The
BBS is useless to a new player as their is no missions on it you can
take.

Your either not experienced or dont have the ship to do it. If they
had missions even a newbie could take it would be a start. but for now
its a total waste of time. And only for the Masicast out their.

Oh well.  bring on Elite 4.



On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:01:17 GMT, Memnoch
<memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:12:44 GMT, Shingen <shingen@aolsuks.sbcglobal.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:22:21 GMT, Memnoch
>><memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I patched to 1.4 and found the game a lot smoother. Haven't seen any great
>>>additions to the game that will make the game more fun for me unfortunately.
>>
>>
>>So is X3 basically the same as X2?...'cept for fancy graphics and
>>whatnots?
>
>Some people would say yes. I never got into X2 very far as I had just come off
>playing X-Tension or X 1.5 as it should have been known. It was so similar I
>just couldn't be arsed to play it after a week. This game is more of the same
>it just looks a hell of a lot better. It is fun but I worry that Egosoft are
>doing games development Smart style, selling the same product over and over
>again. All of their games have the same basic premise really. Space is broken
>up into little grids with gates at the four cardinal points (very roughly).
>Outside of this area there is usually nothing going on.  You fly you ship
>across this chessboard selling and fighting. If I described the game that way
>to someone I honestly believe they wouldn't be able to tell which of their
>four games I was referring to. The thing that makes it apart from the
>graphics, which are superb, are the fan made scripts especially the
>artificical life ones.

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:21:04 GMT, Kylie Saunders posted to
comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.space-sim:

> X3 is the same X2 evn the Bordem remains. Tedium and fucktardiness.
> The Germans lost the WAR why are they aloud to do this to us with this
> game NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
>
> I can't belive thi sgam eis a full priced game. Its a backyard-garage
> game. Sur eit looks good but its SO FRACING boring. Ist supposed to be
> space trading game. But its Go SO BORING missions its unbleivable. The
> BBS is useless to a new player as their is no missions on it you can
> take.
>
> Your either not experienced or dont have the ship to do it. If they
> had missions even a newbie could take it would be a start. but for now
> its a total waste of time. And only for the Masicast out their.

And we should take gameplay advice from a retard whose spelling and
grammar are as bad as yours? Sure, I make a mistake now and again too,
but I can't even begin to count the errors in that post, they are so
numerous.

Take my advise: stop playing games and go back to school.

-- 
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:21:04 +1100, Kylie Saunders <Kylie
Saunders.com.au> wrote:

>I can't belive thi sgam eis a full priced game. Its a backyard-garage
>game. Sur eit looks good but its SO FRACING boring. Ist supposed to be
>space trading game. But its Go SO BORING missions its unbleivable. The
>BBS is useless to a new player as their is no missions on it you can
>take.

X2 was pretty boring after the first 30+  hours in. I still prefer
X-Tensions to X2 just for the nostalgia factor. (X-BTF too). X-T and
X-2 are pretty much like BCM and UC. Same game, different graphics. 

If X3 is the same, then I'll prolly wait till it's bargin-bin and pick
it up for $9.99
 

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:52:33 GMT, Klaatu <klaatu@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>
>And we should take gameplay advice from a retard whose spelling and
>grammar are as bad as yours? Sure, I make a mistake now and again too,
>but I can't even begin to count the errors in that post, they are so
>numerous.
>
You forgot to say that he's a phuckin' top-poster as well!

>Take my advise: stop playing games and go back to school.

Take my advise and stop spell-checking usenet. Usenet is for
anti-social drunks who can't speel anithig. =P

I think people who complain about speeeeeling and grammer and top
posting are the fucktards. 

And i know how to draw tthe fucktards out i do :P


On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:11:06 GMT, Shingen
<shingen@aolsuks.sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:21:04 +1100, Kylie Saunders <Kylie
>Saunders.com.au> wrote:
>
>>I can't belive thi sgam eis a full priced game. Its a backyard-garage
>>game. Sur eit looks good but its SO FRACING boring. Ist supposed to be
>>space trading game. But its Go SO BORING missions its unbleivable. The
>>BBS is useless to a new player as their is no missions on it you can
>>take.
>
>X2 was pretty boring after the first 30+  hours in. I still prefer
>X-Tensions to X2 just for the nostalgia factor. (X-BTF too). X-T and
>X-2 are pretty much like BCM and UC. Same game, different graphics. 
>
>If X3 is the same, then I'll prolly wait till it's bargin-bin and pick
>it up for $9.99
> 

Re: Take my advise: stop playing games and go back to school

Do you mean, "advice"?

BWA-HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAA! Where's your grammar? Oh, she's dead is she?