🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:04:40 GMT, "FLY135" <fly_135(@ hot not
not)notmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Ceowulf" <ceo@NOSPAMii.ATALLnet> wrote in message
>news:40238bf2$0$1723$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
>> "turk" <turk96@_*&^%#^&cast.net> wrote in message
>> news:_FFUb.183323$Rc4.1370420@attbi_s54...
>> > Let the celebrations begin...Judge ruled that UC can ship at $19.99.
>> >
>> > http://www.gamespot.com/pc/sim/universalcombat/news_6087551.html
>> >
>> > Now where's the first review...
>>
>> I may get flamed here, but im not sure why people feel good that DS got
>> shafted? Sure its great to have a cheaper game, I aint arguing with that.
>> But it does sound like he would be losing alot of money? He spent the time
>> and effort making it, shouldnt he at least get the chance to reap the
>> rewards too?
>
>Activision has a line of budget titles that are decent for $20.  How is it
>that they can make money if $20 is too low?  I think your statement is a bit
>presumpuous.  Maybe this is simply a rehash of the same game he's marketed
>several times before and it is being resurected from the budget bin for the
>2nd, no 3rd, er 4th? time.
>

Derek claimed to have made lots of money way back when he sold BC3000
v3.2227fbv RC1 as a budget title. I believe it sold for $14.00 then
went to $4.99. Wasn't it also an Activision budget line ?